Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1777 Tel
Judgement Date : 30 April, 2024
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
M.A.C.M.A No.1079 OF 2013
JUDGMENT:
1. The appellant-claimant filed this appeal against the Order
and Decree dated 21.12.2012 in O.P.No.1154 of 2010 on the file of
the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-Cum-XV Additional Chief
Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, where under the Tribunal
granted an amount of Rs.5,98,800/- towards compensation along
with interest @ 7.5% per annum as against the claim of
Rs.15,00,000/- on account of the injuries received by the
appellant in the motor vehicle accident occurred on 27.10.2009.
2. The manner in which the accident had taken place and the
injuries sustained by the appellant-claimant are not in dispute.
The appellant-claimant challenged the impugned award only on
the quantum of compensation awarded by the Tribunal.
Therefore, this Court is not inclined to go into other details other
than the quantum of compensation.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant-claimant and
the learned counsel for respondent No.2-Insurance Company.
4. The claimant was injured in an accident on 27.10.2009.
While she was travelling in an Auto, the offending vehicle which is
a lorry came in a high speed and hit the Auto resulting in the
claimant and others falling down from the Auto and receiving
grievous injuries.
5. The appellant received four fractures and was treated in the
Kamineni Hospital at Basheerbagh.
6. Learned Tribunal having considered the evidence on record
calculated the notional income of the appellant at Rs.2,000/-p.m.
and adopted '12'.
7. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ramachandrappa vs. The
Manager, Royal Sundaram, Alliance Insurance Company
Limited 1, held that the income of a daily wage labour can be
considered at Rs.4,500/- per month. In view of the judgment of
the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ramachandrappa's case, this
Court is inclined to fix the income of the appellant at Rs.4,500/-
p.m notionally. Further, the appropriate multiplier to be adopted
is '13'.
8. Accordingly, taking the income of the deceased at
Rs.4,500/-p.m., the annual income comes to Rs.54,000/-
p.a.(4,500x12). Further, in view of the judgment of the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Pranay
(2011) 13 SCC 236
Sethi 2, 25% has to be considered towards future prospects which
comes to Rs.67,500/-(54,000+13,500). Considering disability at
20%, the amount is arrived at Rs.13,500/-. As per the judgment
of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Smt.Sarla Varma Vs. Delhi
Transport Corporation 3, adopting the appropriate multiplier 13,
the total comes to Rs.1,75,500/-(13,500x13). In addition, the
appellant/claimant is entitled to Rs.5,00,000/- towards medical
expenditure, Rs.50,000/- towards pain and suffering and
Rs.25,000/- towards transport and attendant. Thus, the total
amount, the appellant is are entitled to is Rs.7,50,000/-.
9. In the result, the Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal
is partly allowed enhancing the compensation awarded by the
Tribunal from Rs.5,98,800/- to Rs.7,50,000/-. The enhanced
amount shall carry interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of
petition till the date of realization. Except the above enhancement,
the award of the Tribunal shall remain same on all other aspects.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
__________________ K.SURENDER, J Date : 30.04.2024 dv
2017(6) ALD 170 (SC)
2009(6) SCC 121
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
M.A.C.M.A No.1079 OF 2013 Dt.30.04.2024
dv
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!