Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1776 Tel
Judgement Date : 30 April, 2024
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
MACMA.No.1291 OF 2012
JUDGMENT:
1. This appeal is preferred by the appellant/injured aggrieved
by the compensation granted by the Tribunal in OP.NO.527 of
2006, dated 10.02.2010 and to enhance the same.
2. The 1st respondent is the owner and the 2nd respondent is
the insurer of the offending Jeep bearing No.AP 1T 6005.
3. The case of the appellant-Injured is that on 27.07.2004, at
about 5.00 p.m., he boarded Jeep bearing No.AP 1 T 6005 at
Bhainsa to go to Beerelly village and when the said Jeep reached
Lolam bus stand, the driver of the jeep drove it in a rash and
negligent manner at high speed and lost control over it. As a
result of which the jeep turned turtle towards right side of the
road and the claimant fell down and received grievous injuries on
his head, shoulder, hand and other parts of the body. He was
immediately shifted to Government Hospital, Nirmal, where he
was treated for one day and thereafter he was advised to go for
better treatment. Accordingly, the injured was admitted in Priya
Nursing Home at Nirmal, where he underwent surgery and his
right hand was shortened. Due to the accident the
claimant/injured is unable to do any work with his right hand and
he lost his job.
4. The Police, Narsapur (G) registered case in Crime
No.41/2004 under Sections 337 and 338 of the Indian Penal code
and the driver was punished by the Court.
5. During trial, the Tribunal examined appellant/injured
himself as PW1 and also PW2. Exs.A1 to A26 were marked on
behalf of the claimant. The Tribunal after considering the evidence
on record and documents, came to the conclusion that the
claimant is entitled to compensation of Rs.40,000/- payable by
respondents 1 and 2, jointly and severally.
6. Aggrieved by compensation of Rs.40,000/- though the
claimant claimed Rs.1 lakh, present appeal was filed.
7. Heard both sides.
8. There is no dispute regarding the accident and also the
injuries received by the claimant.
9. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that though the
appellant sustained two grievous injuries, three simple injuries,
and took treatment nearly 20 days as in-patient and underwent
surgery, the Tribunal without considering the same has granted
only Rs.40,000/- as compensation.
10. In the said circumstances, this Court deems appropriate to
grant compensation as follows;
Two grievous injuries
(30,000 + 30,000) Rs.60,000
Three simple injuries
(10,000 x 3) Rs.30,000
Pain and suffering + Attendant
Charges + Transportation Rs.30,000
____________
Total: Rs.1,20,000/-
_____________
11. Thus, the appellant/injured is entitled to a total
compensation of Rs.1,20,000/-.
12. Accordingly, the M.A.C.M.A is allowed by enhancing the
compensation amount awarded by the Tribunal from Rs.40,000/-
to Rs.1,20,000/- with proportionate costs and interest @ 7.5% p.a.
on the enhanced amount from the date of petition till the date of
realisation payable by the respondents 1 to 2 jointly and severally,
within 6 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On
such deposit, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the entire
amount without furnishing any security. The claimant has to pay
the deficit Court fee or the Tribunal may deduct the amount
required for the purpose of Court fee from the amount awarded to
the claimant after respondent Insurance Company deposits the
amount.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in
this appeal shall stand closed.
___________________ K.SURENDER, J
Dt. 30.04.2024 tk
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!