Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2400 Tel
Judgement Date : 14 September, 2023
HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P. SREE SUDHA
SECOND APPEAL NO. 517 OF 2004
JUDGMENT:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, there was
no representation for the appellant in spite of posting the
matter under the caption 'for dismissal' on 11.08.2023.
2. It is represented that learned counsel for the
appellant has passed away and he is no more. Thereafter
the appellant has not taken any steps to prosecute the
matter despite the matter has been posted 'for dismissal'.
3. Initially, plaintiff had filed a batch of suits against
various defendants for recovery of possession of plaint
schedule property and for mesne profits and the suit was
decreed. In the appeal, some of cases are partly decreed
and some are dismissed. The unsuccessful appellant filed
the present Second Appeal against the said judgment and
decree.
4. A perusal of the record shows that the Second Appeal
has been filed in the year 2004. The learned counsel for
the appellant is not evincing any interest to pursue the
appeal. No purpose is served if the Second Appeal is kept
pending.
5. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-
prosecution. No order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall
stand closed.
_____________________
P. SREE SUDHA, J
Date: 14.09.2023
Skj.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!