Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2115 Tel
Judgement Date : 8 September, 2023
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No.18784 of 2007
ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Alok Aradhe)
None appears for the petitioners.
Dr. J.Vijaya Laxmi, learned Government Pleader for
Revenue (Assignment) for the revenue officials.
2. In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the
following relief:
For the reasons stated in the accompanying
affidavit, it is hereby prayed that this Hon'ble Court may
be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or
direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of
mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in
not issuing the patta certificates as prepared in File No.B6/195/75 dated 05.10.1979 by the Tahsildar, Medchal and also not implementing the judgment of this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P.Nos.3192 of 1992 and batch dated 25.03.2004 in respect of the lands belonging to the petitioners situated in S.Nos.9, 81 and 13 admeasuring Acs.5.00 each situated at
Jawaharnagar Village, Shameerpet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, and consequently declare that the petitioners are entitled for grant of patta and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
3. Petitioners No.1 and 2 claim to be ex-servicemen.
Similarly, it is the case of the petitioners that father of
petitioner No.3 also was an ex-serviceman. The petitioners
have sought the relief referred to supra on the ground that
land bearing Survey Nos.9, 13 and 81 measuring Acs.5.00
each in Jawaharnagar Village, Shamirpet Mandal, Ranga
Reddy District (hereinafter referred to as, "the subject
land"), was allotted to them by the Jawahar Nagar Co-
operative Land Colonisation Society. The petitioners claim
to be in possession of the subject land and they challenge
the action of the respondents in not issuing patta
certificates and in not implementing the judgment of this
Court passed in W.P.No.3912 of 1992 and batch dated
25.03.2004 in respect of the subject land.
4. We have heard learned Government Pleader for
Revenue (Assignment).
5. Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the
revenue officials. Learned Government Pleader for Revenue
(Assignment) submits that the subject land is a
Government land. It has also been stated that the names
of either petitioners No.1 and 2 or the father of petitioner
No.3 are not found in the list of eligible persons entitled for
allotment of the subject land, which was prepared by the
Jawahar Nagar Co-operative Land Colonisation Society. It
has also been submitted that the petitioners are not in
possession of the subject land and that vide order dated
25.03.2004 passed in W.P.No.3912 of 1992 and batch,
liberty has been given to the ex-servicemen to appear
before the Mandal Revenue Officer, Shamirpet Mandal, on
15.04.2004 with a representation with regard to possession
and other particulars. Thereupon, the Mandal Revenue
Officer has been directed to fix a date for proper enquiry
and to complete the enquiry within two months thereafter.
The petitioners herein were not the petitioners in the
aforesaid batch of writ petitions.
6. We have carefully perused the averments as well as
the documents annexed to the writ petition.
7. Petitioners have only produced a copy of the
document titled as "Distribution of land" which refers to
the Jawahar Nagar Land Colonisation. In the aforesaid
document, reference has been made to the order of
allotment dated 09.11.1966. Neither the order of allotment
nor a copy of the general body of the Jawahar Nagar Co-
operative Land Colonisation Society has been annexed.
The petitioners have annexed a notification dated
05.10.1979 issued by the Revenue Department of
Government of Andhra Pradesh by which the objections for
assignment of land in question have been invited. It is
pertinent to mention here that in the said notification, the
subject land has not been mentioned. The patta certificate
annexed at page No.39 of the paper book shows that some
land has been assigned to one Mohd. Sharfuddin. The
petitioners have not annexed any document in support of
their claim that the subject land is either allotted to them
or their father.
8. In view of the specific stand taken by the learned
Government Pleader for Revenue (Assignment) that the
subject land is a Government land and has neither been
allotted to the petitioners or their father nor they are in
possession of the same, it was obligatory for the petitioners
to have annexed the documents in support of their claim
that the subject land is allotted to them. The petitioners
have not filed any reply affidavit to the counter affidavit nor
have they annexed the documents.
9. In the absence of any material that the subject land
was allotted to the petitioners, no relief as prayed for by the
petitioners in this writ petition can be granted.
10. In the result, the writ petition fails and the same is
accordingly dismissed.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall
stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
______________________________________ ALOK ARADHE, CJ
______________________________________ N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR, J
08.09.2023 vs
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!