Sunday, 12, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ch. Gopala Rao vs Immaneni Linga Rao,
2023 Latest Caselaw 3116 Tel

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3116 Tel
Judgement Date : 12 October, 2023

Telangana High Court
Ch. Gopala Rao vs Immaneni Linga Rao, on 12 October, 2023
Bench: Alok Aradhe, N.V.Shravan Kumar
          THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
                                            AND
            THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
                              Writ Appeal No. 738 of 2010
JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Alok Aradhe)

        Heard Mr. K.Ashok Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant;

Mr. M.Bharat Shah, learned counsel representing Mr. D.Linga Rao,

learned counsel for respondents No.1 to 4; and Mr. T.Srikanth

Reddy, learned Government Pleader for Revenue representing

respondents No.5 to 7.


2.      This intra court appeal has been filed against order

dated 16.03.2009, passed by a learned Single Judge, by which writ

petition viz., W.P.No.27465 of 2008, preferred by respondents

No.1 to 4, has been disposed of in the following terms:

                 "Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of
            directing that it shall be open to the petitioners to file
            the applications in the prescribed form for issuance
            of pattadar pass books in respect of their land before
            the 3rd respondent within a period of four weeks from
            today. In case, such applications are filed, they shall
            be considered on their own merits and the police
            authorities shall not take any steps on the basis of the
                                  ::2::



         existing pattadar pass books. There shall be no order
         as to costs."

3.    Facts

giving rise to filing of this appeal briefly stated are that,

respondents No.1 to 4, who are agriculturists, approached the

Manager of State Bank of Hyderabad (briefly 'the Bank'

hereinafter) with a request to advance loans. Respondents No.1

to 4 produced their pattadar pass books before the Bank, which, in

turn, addressed communication dated 12.09.2008 to the Revenue

Divisional Officer, Sircilla (respondent No.6) to verify the genuinity

of the pattadar pass books.

4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, by communication

dated 01.11.2008, informed the Manager of the Bank that out of six

pattadar pass books, two were found to be genuine and no entries

were found in the records maintained in the office of Tahsildar,

Sircilla (respondent No.7), in respect of the remaining pattadar pass

books. A copy of the communication was forwarded to the Station

House Officer, Sircilla, for necessary investigation.

::3::

5. Respondents No.1 to 4/writ petitioners challenged the

validity of the communication dated 01.11.2008 in the aforesaid

writ petition.

6. Learned Single Judge disposed of the writ petition preferred

by respondents No.1 to 4 with the direction as aforesaid.

7. Being aggrieved, the appellant, who is not a party to the

proceeding before the learned Single Judge, has filed this appeal

inter alia on the ground that he is the owner of the land in question.

8. We have heard learned counsel for the parties at length.

9. From a perusal of the proceeding sheet, it is evident that this

appeal is pending before this Court since 2010 and no interim order

has been passed. Respondents No.1 to 4 might have filed the

applications for issuance of pattadar pass books before the

Tahsildar, Sircilla. The fate of the applications, which might have

been filed by respondents No.1 to 4/writ petitioners is also not

known. Therefore, at this point of time, it is not necessary to ::4::

examine the validity of the order passed by the learned Single

Judge.

10. However, it is clarified that neither this Court nor the learned

Single Judge has expressed any opinion with regard to right, title or

interest in respect of the land in question, which, in any case, has to

be decided by the competent civil court.

11. At this point of time, no interference is called for with the

order dated 16.03.2009, passed by the learned Single Judge, in

W.P.No.27465 of 2008, as the direction issued therein has

exhausted itself.

12. The Writ Appeal is, accordingly, disposed of. No costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, stand

closed.

__________________ ALOK ARADHE, CJ

_______________________ N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR, J Date: 12.10.2023 LUR

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Media

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter