Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3014 Tel
Judgement Date : 9 October, 2023
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT APPEAL No.981 of 2023
JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Alok Aradhe)
Mr. Syed Lateef, learned counsel for the appellant.
Mr. T. Srikanth Reddy, learned Government Pleader
for Stamps and Registration, for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Mr. M.A.K. Mukheed, learned counsel for respondent
Nos.3 and 4.
2. In this intra court appeal, the appellant has assailed
the validity of order dated 09.02.2023 passed by the
learned Single Judge by which W.P.No.18899 of 2022
preferred by him has been dismissed.
3. The facts giving rise to filing of this appeal briefly
stated are that the appellant has entered into an
agreement in respect of land admeasuring Acs.8.00 in
Sy.No.276/LU situated at Zaheerabad Village, Sanga
Reddy District (hereinafter referred to as "the subject ::2::
land"). Respondent No.2 has registered the sale deed dated
18.02.2022 in respect of the subject land. Thereupon, the
appellant filed the writ petition under which a declaration
was sought that the action of registering the sale deed
dated 18.02.2022 is without any authority of law as the
subject land is not an agricultural land. The writ petition
preferred by the appellant has been dismissed by the
learned Single Judge inter alia on the ground that the
appellant has no right in respect of the subject land.
4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the
learned Single Judge ought to have appreciated that the
subject land was not an agricultural land and therefore,
respondent No.2 has no authority to execute the sale deed.
5. Be that as it may, the appellant claims title in respect
of the subject land on the strength of an agreement. It is
not in dispute that the appellant has filed a civil suit
seeking relief of permanent injunction. Therefore, it is
open for the appellant to seek declaration that the
aforesaid sale deed is illegal in the civil suit instituted by
him. Therefore, the learned Single Judge has rightly ::3::
declined to entertain the writ petition preferred by the
appellant.
6. In the result, we do not find any merit in this appeal,
the same fails and is hereby dismissed. There shall be no
order as to costs.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall
stand closed.
_______________________________ ALOK ARADHE, CJ
_______________________________ N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR, J
Date: 09.10.2023 ES
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!