Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2918 Tel
Judgement Date : 5 October, 2023
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMBASIVA RAO NAIDU
SECOND APPEAL NO.1184 OF 2017
JUDGMENT :
Learned counsel for the appellant on record, would
submit that he has no instructions from his client in spite of his
best efforts. Further, though he tried to contact the counsel before
the Court below to get the instructions, it was in vain.
2. In the light of the above, it appears that the appellant
is not interested to prosecute the matter vigilantly and diligently
any more. This appeal is preferred against the concurrent findings
of the Trial Court as well as the first appellate Court. Therefore,
this Court feels that there is no necessity to issue notice to the
appellant asking him to come to the Court. Accordingly, this
appeal is liable to be dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. Resultantly, this appeal is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
Pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall stand
closed.
___________________________________ JUSTICE SAMBASIVA RAO NAIDU DATED 05.10.2023 YNK THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SAMBASIVA RAO NAIDU
SECOND APPEAL NO.1184 OF 2017
DATED 05.10.2023
YNK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!