Monday, 13, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

G. Kanakaiah vs The State Of Telangana
2023 Latest Caselaw 1483 Tel

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1483 Tel
Judgement Date : 31 March, 2023

Telangana High Court
G. Kanakaiah vs The State Of Telangana on 31 March, 2023
Bench: K. Sarath
      THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH

          WRIT PETITION No.8849 of 2023


ORDER:

This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:

"... to issue an order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering claim of the petitioner for regularization of their services retrospectively on completion of five years of continuous service in the department by implementing the orders passed by the Hon'ble Tribunal in O.A.No.3130 of 2016 dated 07.09.2016 is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional, apart from violative of Principles of Natural Justice and consequently to direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners for regularization of their services retrospectively on completion of five years of continuous service in the department for the purpose of pension and pensioner benefits by implementing the orders passed by the Hon'ble Tribunal in O.A.No.3130 of 2016, dated 07.09.2016 and following the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in case of B.Srinivasulu Vs. Nellore Municipal Corporation in Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015 dated 17.08.2015 and the judgment of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.33936 of 2011 and batch dated 02.05.2018 with all consequential benefits"

2. Heard Sri A.Malahar Rao, Learned Counsel

appearing or the petitioners and Learned Government

SK,J W.P.No.8849 of 2023

Pleader for Services-II appearing for respondents. With

the consent of Learned counsel on either side, this Writ

Petition is disposed of at the admission stage.

3. It is the case of the petitioners that initially, they

were appointed as daily wage workers through

Employment Exchange and have completed more than

35 years of service. While so, the State Government has

issued G.O.Ms.No.212, Finance & Planning

Department, dated 22.04.1994, according to which,

those who have completed five years of continuous

service as on 25.11.1993, are entitled for

regularization. When their cases were not considered

for regularization, they approached the then A.P.A.T by

filing O.A.No.5951 of 2012 and the same was disposed

of on 21.08.2012 and directed the respondents to

consider the case of the petitioners for regularization of

services on completion of five years of service from the

date of their initial appointment. In spite of the same,

the respondents have not considered their cases.

Hence, the Writ Petition.

SK,J W.P.No.8849 of 2023

4. The grievance of the petitioners is that though

they were fully qualified and eligible for regularization

of their services as per G.O.Ms.No.212, dated

22.04.1994, the official respondents are not

considering their cases for regularization.

5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners

submits that as per the law laid down by the Apex

Court in B.Srinivasulu Vs. Nellore Municipal Corporation

(Civil Appeal No.6318 of 2015, dated 17.8.2015), and

also as per the judgment rendered by this Court in

W.P.No.33936 of 2011 & batch, dated 02.05.2018, the

petitioners are entitled for regularization from the date

on which they have completed five years of service. He

further submits that though the Tribunal vide order

dated 21.08.2012 in O.A.No.5951 of 2012 directed the

respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for

regularization of their services, the respondents have

not complied with the same.

6. Learned Government Pleader appearing for the

respondents does not dispute the law laid down by the

SK,J W.P.No.8849 of 2023

Apex Court in B.Srinivasulu Vs. Nellore Municipal

Corporation (cited supra).

7. Having considered the rival submissions made

by the learned counsel on either side, this Court is of

the considered view that the issue raised in this writ

petition is squarely covered by the judgment of the

Apex Court in B.Srinivasulu V/s. Nellore Municipal

Corporation (cited supra).

8. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of

directing the respondents to consider the case of the

petitioners from the date of completion of five years

service in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.212, dated

22.4.1994 and regularize their services with

retrospective effect only for the purpose of pensionary

benefits, without monetary benefits, and pass

appropriate orders, within a period of four (4) weeks

from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There

shall be no order as to costs.

SK,J W.P.No.8849 of 2023

9. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall

stand closed.

_____________________ JUSTICE K.SARATH

Date:31.03.2023 bb

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Media

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter