Monday, 13, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kodali Sajini vs State Of Telangana
2023 Latest Caselaw 1095 Tel

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1095 Tel
Judgement Date : 9 March, 2023

Telangana High Court
Kodali Sajini vs State Of Telangana on 9 March, 2023
Bench: B.Vijaysen Reddy
       HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY

               WRIT PETITION No.1647 OF 2023

ORDER : (ORAL)

      The writ petition is filed seeking to declare action of

respondent Nos.2 to 4 in not providing police protection to the life

and property of the petitioner i.e., different extents of land bearing

Sy. Nos.278 and 279, total admeasuring Ac.8.03 guntas situated at

Maheswaram Village and Mandal, Ranga Reddy District to secure

compliance of ad-interim injunction order dated 04.01.2023 passed

in I.A. No.16 of 2023 in O.S. No.2 of 2023 by the learned Junior

Civil Judge - cum - XVII Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, at

Maheshwaram, Ranga Reddy District on the representation of the

petitioner dated 12.01.2023, as illegal and arbitrary.

2. Heard Sri Mohd. Moin Ahmed Quadri, and the

learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home and perused the

material available on record.

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home

submitted that in view of judgment of the Division Bench of this

Court dated 13.02.2023 in W.A. No.187 of 2023, the Writ petition

is liable to be dismissed. In paragraph Nos.14 to 17 following

observations are made by the learned Division Bench.

"14. Rule 2A of Order XXXIX of CPC reads as under:

2A. Consequence of disobedience or breach of injunction. (1) In the case of disobedience of any injunction granted or other order made under rule 1 or rule 2 or breach of any of the terms on which the injunction was granted or the order made, the Court granting the injunction or making the order, or any Court to which the suit or proceeding is transferred, may order the property of the person guilty of such disobedience or breach to be attached, and may also order such person to be detained in the civil prison for a term not exceeding three months, unless in the meantime the Court directs his release.

(2) No attachment made under this rule shall remain in force for more than one year, at the end of which time if the disobedience or breach continues, the property attached may be sold and out of the proceeds, the Court may award such compensation as it thinks fit to the injured party and shall pay the balance, if any, to the party entitled thereto.

15. From the above, it is evident that if there is any disobedience to an

order of injunction made under Rule 1 or Rule 2 of Order XXXIX CPC or

breach of any of the terms on which the injunction was granted or the order

made, the Court granting injunction or any court to which the suit or proceeding

is transferred may order the property of the person guilty of such disobedience or

breach to be attached and may also order such person to be detained in civil

prison for a term not exceeding three months unless in the meantime, the Court

directs his release. Therefore, Rule 2A of Order XXXIX CPC provides for

an adequate and efficacious remedy to a person who is aggrieved by disobedience

to or breach of an injunction order granted in his favour.

16. That being so, we are of the view that petitions filed under Article

226 of the Constitution of India seeking police aid to enforce or implement an

order of injunction or to restrain persons from interfering with the order of

injunction should not be ordinarily entertained unless an element of injury to the

public or infraction of statute is made out. Otherwise, it would amount to

entering into an arena of private dispute(s).

17. Accordingly, granting liberty to the appellants to avail their remedy

under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC, the writ appeal is dismissed."

4. In view of the same, this Court is not inclined to

entertain this writ petition.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. However,

petitioner is given liberty to invoke remedy under Order XXXIX

Rule 2A of the C.P.C. or Section 151 of the C.P.C. or

implementation of the injunction order or granting police aid.

There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any,

pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.

________________________ B. VIJAYSEN REDDY, J March 09, 2023 LPD

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY

WRIT PETITION No.1647 OF 2023

09.03.2023

March 09, 2023 LPD

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Media

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter