Tuesday, 14, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mr. Timothy T. Gonmei, vs The State Of Ap Rep By Its Pp Hyd., ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 371 Tel

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 371 Tel
Judgement Date : 27 January, 2023

Telangana High Court
Mr. Timothy T. Gonmei, vs The State Of Ap Rep By Its Pp Hyd., ... on 27 January, 2023
Bench: P.Sree Sudha
   HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA

            CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No:727 OF 2011


JUDGMENT:

The petitioner, who was unsuccessful in getting the Vehicle viz., Auto bearing No.AP 5 W 8028 released in C.F.No.1695 of 2011 in

Cr.No.103 of 2011 filed under Sections 457 Cr.P.C. before the Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Peddapuram.

Apparently, the petitioner is the owner of the vehicle in question

and the same was seized in connection with a case registered under Section 7(A) r/w 8 (e) of the A.P. Prohibition Act. When the petitioner

filed an application under Section 457 Cr.P.C., the learned Magistrate passed an order stating that he has no jurisdiction to entertain the

application.

Having regard to the judgments passed by this Court in

P. Swarupa and Others V. State of Andhra Pradesh[1],

Jitendra Palnitker Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh[2] and Sunderbhai

Ambalal Desai V. State of Gujarat[3], that there is a bar of jurisdiction

to entertain any application pertaining to release of the vehicle,

Section 31 of the Andhra Pradesh Prohibition Act, 1995 has an overriding effect over the A.P. Excise Act. In the light of the said

provision of law, it shall be held that the Magistrate is empowered to

pass orders under section 451 or 457 Cr.P.C. and to release the

vehicle by way of interim custody.

This Criminal Revision Case is allowed, at the stage of

admission, with a direction to the Additional Judicial First Class

Magistrate, Peddapuram, on the following conditions:

1) The petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five thousand only) with two sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Peddapuram.

2) He shall give an undertaking that he will produce the vehicle in question as and when required and he shall not alienate the same during the course of enquiry, investigation and trial.

Subject to the above conditions, the Criminal Petition is

allowed.

_____________________________ Justice Gopala Krishna Tamada

Dated: 25.3.2011 Nn HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No:727 OF 2011

25.03.2011

[1] 1996(1) ALT Crl.130 [2] 1995(3) ALD 80 [3] (2002) 10 SCC 283

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter