Tuesday, 14, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Maddilapuram Anji Reddy, vs Sonte Mallesh,
2023 Latest Caselaw 304 Tel

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 304 Tel
Judgement Date : 24 January, 2023

Telangana High Court
Maddilapuram Anji Reddy, vs Sonte Mallesh, on 24 January, 2023
Bench: Sambasivarao Naidu
     THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMBASIVA RAO NAIDU

 TRANSFER CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION No.412
                    OF 2022


ORDER :

This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed by

the petitioners under Section 24 of C.P.C., with a prayer to

transfer Review Petition vide I.A.No.241 of 2022 in

A.S.No.68 of 2015 on the file of II Additional District Judge,

Rangareddy to try along with A.S.No.230 of 2020 pending

on the file of this Court for common disposal. It seems this

petition has been filed pursuant to the observations made

by this Court in appeal suit vide A.S.No.230 of 2020 dated

17.11.2022, wherein the learned Judge made an

observation that the review petition could have been

transferred to this Court for hearing along with connected

appeal suit for avoiding conflicting decisions.

2. As per the affidavit filed in support of the petition, it

seems different suits have been filed by different parties in

respect of landed property in Sy.Nos.146/7, 146/2, 258

and 127. The petitioners in the present application have

Tr.CMP No.412 of 2022

claimed that 1st petitioner has purchased an extent of 12

guntas of land in Sy.No.146/7 and 17 guntas in

Sy.No.146/2 which was shown as "A" schedule property,

the 2nd petitioner purchased an extent of 36 guntas of land

in Sy.No.258 which was shown as "B" schedule property

and the 3rd petitioner purchased an extent of Ac.1-28

guntas in Sy.No.127 shown as "C" schedule property in the

suit filed by them vide O.S.No.1633 of 2008.

3. It also appears that these petitioners have filed

O.S.No.39 of 2002 on the file of Junior Civil Judge,

Ibrahimpatnam to restrain the alleged interference by one

Sonte Mallaiah (respondent No.1). The said Sonte Mallaiah

disclose in the above said O.S.No.39 of 2002 about an

agreement of sale dated 30.07.1984 and claimed that he

obtained an exparte decree in respect of the above said

properties, thereby the petitioners have filed another suit

vide O.S.No.48 of 1996. They have also pleaded that during

the pendency of O.S.No.48 of 1996 the said Sonte Mallaiah

colluded with Hanumanth Reddy (respondent No.4) and

others and created registered sale deed on 05.10.2005. The

Tr.CMP No.412 of 2022

co-sharers have executed release deed in favour of

respondent No.4 and based on the said release deed,

respondent No.4 filed another suit vide O.S.No.1337 of

2008 on the file of I Additional Senior Civil Judge,

Rangareddy. A transfer petition was filed, and basing on

the orders of the said petition, O.S.No.39 of 2002 was

transferred to I Additional Senior Civil Judge and

renumbered as O.S.No.1723 of 2009. O.S.No.74 of 2002

was re-numbered as O.S.No.1633 of 2008. All the above

suits i.e., O.S.Nos.1337 of 2008, 1633 of 2008 and 1723 of

2009 were disposed by a common judgment. O.S.No.1337

of 2008 was decreed and the remaining two suits were

dismissed.

4. Therefore, the appeal suit vide A.S.No.383 of 2015

was preferred against the judgment in O.S.No.1723 of

2009, but the same was dismissed. Another appeal vide

A.S.No.68 of 2015 against the judgment in O.S.No.1337 of

2008 was preferred and the appellant therein filed

additional documents along with application under Order

41 Rule 27 r/w Section 151 CPC and the said petition was

Tr.CMP No.412 of 2022

allowed by the appellate Court. A.S.No.68 of 2015 was

dismissed by the appellate Court on 17.02.2022.

5. Therefore, the appellants therein, filed review petition

vide I.A.No.241 of 2022 and the same is pending before II

Additional District Judge, Rangareddy.

6. The petitioners have further stated that they have

filed A.S.No.230 of 2020 before this Court against the

judgment in O.S.No.1633 of 2008. Though they moved an

application for clubbing all the suits at the appellate stage,

their application was dismissed by this Court on

03.09.2021. However, while hearing A.S.No.230 of 2020,

this Court made an observation that to avoid conflicting

orders, it would be better to get the review petition be

transferred to this Court, thereby the petitioners have filed

this application with a prayer to transfer I.A.No.241 of

2022 in A.S.No.68 of 2015 from the file of II Additional

District Judge, Rangareddy for hearing and disposal along

with A.S.No.238 of 2020 pending before this Court.

Tr.CMP No.412 of 2022

7. Proof of service filed. The respondents appeared

before the Court through learned Advocate. When the

matter is taken up for hearing and when learned counsel

for the appellants submitted the circumstances under

which the present transfer petition has been moved,

learned counsel for the respondents reported no objection

for transfer of the above referred review petition from II

Additional District Judge, Rangareddy to High Court.

8. As could be seen from the above referred averments

and as per the record, the review sought to be transferred

from II Additional District Judge, Rangareddy is against the

judgment in A.S.No.68 of 2015, which in fact was disposed

on 17.02.2022. It is a fact that A.S.No.68 of 2015 has been

filed against the judgment in O.S.No.1337 of 2008. The

affidavit filed in support of the petition and the arguments

advanced by the counsel clearly shows that three different

suits referred above were disposed by a common judgment

and A.S.No.230 of 2020 has been filed against the

judgment in O.S.No.1633 of 2008 whereas the review

petition is in respect of O.S.No.1337 of 2008. Therefore, as

Tr.CMP No.412 of 2022

rightly submitted by the counsel for the petitioners here, it

is just and necessary to get the review petition be

transferred to this Court for disposal along with A.S.No.230

of 2020 for which, learned counsel for the respondents

reported no objection.

9. In the result, the petition is allowed. I.A.No.241 of

2022 pending on the file of II Additional District Judge,

Rangareddy, is withdrawn and transferred to this Court for

hearing along with A.S.No.230 of 2020.

10. The concerned Court is hereby directed to transmit

the entire case file, after duly indexed, within (4) four

weeks from the date of receipt of this Order, under the

intimation to the other side.

As a sequel, pending Miscellaneous Applications, if

any, shall stand closed.

___________________________________ JUSTICE SAMBASIVA RAO NAIDU Date:24.01.2023 Pssk

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter