Monday, 13, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Morle Bheemaiah vs The State Of A.P.
2023 Latest Caselaw 237 Tel

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 237 Tel
Judgement Date : 18 January, 2023

Telangana High Court
Morle Bheemaiah vs The State Of A.P. on 18 January, 2023
Bench: K.Surender
            HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

         CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.20 of 2008
JUDGMENT:

1. The Petitioner is aggrieved by the concurrent finding of

conviction under Sections 306 and 498-A of IPC vide judgment

in S.C.No.530 of 2005 dated 23.03.2007 passed by the

Assistant Sessions Judge, Asifabad which is confirmed by the

judgment in Criminal Appeal No.40 of 2007, dated 18.12.2007

passed by the III Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Asifabad.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was

married to the deceased No.1, ten years prior to the incident of

her committing suicide on 14.11.2004. The crux of the

allegation is that the petitioner used to harass his wife in a

drunken condition and beat her on a daily basis. On

14.11.2004, the petitioner asked for money from his wife for

betting In cock fights. On refusal, she was beaten with a

chappal in front of his four year old child and others, for

which reason, feeling insulted by the conduct of the petitioner,

she went to well and drowned herself along with her four year

old daughter.

3. Crime was registered initially for the offence under

Sections 498-A, 306 and 302 of IPC. However, charge sheet

was filed for the offence under Sections 498-A and 306 of IPC.

The wife/deceased No.1 tied her daughter to her waist and

jumped into the well, according to the investigation, unable to

bear the continuous harassment of the petitioner.

4. Learned Assistant Sessions Judge found the petitioner

guilty under both the counts of Section 306 and 498-A IPC

and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period

of two years and six months respectively. On appeal, learned

Sessions Judge concurred with the findings of the Assistant

Sessions Judge and confirmed the sentence.

5. As seen from the record, the petitioner was in the habit of

drinking and in an intoxicated condition, beating his wife

almost on a daily basis. On the day when the deceased

committed suicide by tying her four years old daughter to her

waist and drowned herself into the well, the petitioner had

insulted her by beating her with chappal for not parting with

the amount which was asked for betting purposes.

6. The circumstances of i) beating the deceased on daily

basis; ii) not taking care of wife and child; iii) on the day of

committing suicide beating her with chappal, cumulatively

amounts to abetting or intentional aiding to commit suicide,

since the conduct over a period of time culminated in the

deceased committing suicide along with the daughter. Nothing

has been placed on record to find fault with the deceased in

any manner including her mental stability by way of cross-

examination. Since this Court under revision can only

interfere in the event of any illegality or impropriety in the

finding of lower Courts is found. Normally, this Court cannot

venture into re-appreciating the facts in Revisional

jurisdiction. However, on facts also, the continued conduct of

harassing his wife by beating her, resulted in the deceased

committing suicide along with the child, unable to bear the

torture over a period of time.

7. The argument on behalf of the accused that it is a case

of beating on a given day and such quarrel or beating would

not amount to abetting suicide, has no legs to stand.

8. Continuously harassing or beating the wife would

amount to abetting to commit suicide. It is not the case of a

solitary incident of beating. In the said circumstances, there

are no grounds to interfere with the concurrent finding of guilt

of the petitioner under Sections 306 and 498-A of IPC.

9. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed.

Since the accused is on bail, the court concerned shall cause

the presence of the petitioner and send him to serve out the

remaining period of imprisonment. Needless to say the period

of imprisonment already undergone by the petitioner shall be

given set off under Section 428 of Cr.P.C.

_________________ K.SURENDER, J Date: 18.01.2023 kvs

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

Criminal Revision Case No.20 of 2008

Dated: 18.01.2023

kvs

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter