Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chaithanya Educational And ... vs Chaithanya Educational And ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 2581 Tel

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2581 Tel
Judgement Date : 10 June, 2022

Telangana High Court
Chaithanya Educational And ... vs Chaithanya Educational And ... on 10 June, 2022
Bench: Satish Chandra Sharma, Abhinand Kumar Shavili
 THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
                                             AND
       THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
                                   W.A.No. 806 of 2018
JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma)

        The present appeal is arising out of order dated 26.04.2018,

passed by the learned Single Judge, in W.P.No.23263 of 2017.

        It has been argued by learned counsel for the appellant that

the appellant- Chaitanya Educational and Social Welfare Society

(for short 'the Society') is represented by its President Polisetti

Prasad, S/o P.Raju, but a person viz., K.Innaiah, who was not a

president at all at the relevant point of time, preferred a writ

petition with a prayer for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or

direction directing the Andhra Pradesh Grameena Vikas Bank,

Jagdavur X Road, Bonagir, District Yadadri Bonagir, to permit him

to operate the bank account. The learned Single Judge has allowed

the writ petition permitting him to operate the bank account,

against which the present writ appeal has been filed.

        This Court has granted an interim order on 30.07.2018.

        There is a dispute between the parties in respect of the post

of President and office bearers of the Society and such a dispute
                                   ::2::



cannot be decided in exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 226

of the Constitution of India.

         Resultantly, Order dated 26.04.2018, passed by the learned

Single Judge in W.P.No.23263 of 2018 is, hereby, set aside and the

petitioner as well as respondent No.1 shall be free to resolve their

dispute in respect of the post of President by approaching an

appropriate fora. After resolving the dispute, the President of the

Society can approach the bank for withdrawal of the amount and

for operating the bank account.

With the aforesaid, the writ appeal stands disposed of. No

costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, stand

closed.

______________________________ SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, CJ

______________________________ ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, J Date: 10-06-2022 LUR ::3::

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter