Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 712 Tel
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2022
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
&
HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI
WRIT PETITION NOs.8577 and 8602 OF 2022
Date: 17.02.2022
WP No.8577 of 2022:
Between:
Union of India, Ministry of Finance,
Department of Revenue, North Block,
New Delhi, rep.by its Secretary
and three others
.....Petitioners
and
The Central Administrative Tribunal,
Hyderabad Bench, HaCA Bhavan,
Lakdikapul, Hyderabad and another.
.....Respondents
The Court made the following:
PNR,J & Dr.GRR,J WP Nos.8577 & 8602 of 2022
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO & HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI
WRIT PETITION NOs.8577 & 8602 OF 2022
COMMON ORDER: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice P.Naveen Rao)
These two writ petitions are filed challenging the decision of the
Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A.Nos.396 of 2021 and 388 of
2021, dated 12.07.2021, respectively.
2. In O.A.No.396 of 2021, the applicant is working as Inspector of
Customs and in O.A.No.388 of 2021 the applicant is working as
Superintendent of Customs. These two OAs were filed challenging
the orders of suspension from service dated 02.03.2021 on the
allegation of clearance of unaccompanied baggage.
3. Heard learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for
learned standing counsel Mr. B.Jithender for petitioners and
Mr. N.Vijay learned counsel for 2nd respondent in both cases.
4. The Hon'ble Tribunal having noticed that charge-sheets were
not drawn in departmental proceedings even after 90 days of expiry of
date of suspension from service, following the decision of the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in Ajay Kumar Choudhary vs. Union of India1, set
aside the orders of suspension and further extension and directed the
reinstatement of the applicants. Tribunal further directed that on re-
instatement, the applicants be posted to non-sensitive posts with
attendant provisos as laid down in Ajay Kumar Choudhary. The
Tribunal granted eight weeks time for compliance of the orders.
Review Petitions filed by the petitioners to review the said decisions
were also rejected.
2015 (7) SCC 291 PNR,J & Dr.GRR,J WP Nos.8577 & 8602 of 2022
5. In compliance of the directions of the Tribunal, both applicants
were reinstated vide orders dated 27.08.2021. Court is informed that
Shri K.Goutham, 2nd respondent in W.P.No.8577 of 2021, was
promoted as Superintendent of Customs. On reinstatement, both
applicants are working in the respective places of postings.
6. Learned Additional Solicitor General sought to contend that
view taken by the Tribunal on not drawing charge-sheets within 90
days is not valid and the Tribunal erred in relying upon the judgment
in Ajay Kumar Choudhary. In the facts of this case, said principle
has no application and the Tribunal erred in interfering with the
orders of suspension from services. As the allegations leveled against
the 2nd respondent in both writ petitions are grave, it is not in public
interest to continue them in service.
7. Having regard to developments subsequent to the orders of the
Tribunal, we are not expressing any opinion on these submissions of
the learned Additional Solicitor General. Therefore, Writ Petitions are
disposed of without interfering with the directions of the Tribunal.
However, it is made clear that there is no expression of opinion on
merits of the contentions urged by the learned Additional Solicitor
General and the issues raised in the writ petitions are left open to be
urged in appropriate proceedings. Pending miscellaneous petitions if
any shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
______________________________ DR.JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI Date: 17.02.2022 Kkm PNR,J & Dr.GRR,J WP Nos.8577 & 8602 of 2022
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO & HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI
WRIT PETITION NOs.8577 and 8602 OF 2022
Date: 17.02.2022 kkm
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!