Tuesday, 14, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Abdul Waheed Khan Kirana And ... vs The State Of Telangana
2022 Latest Caselaw 7034 Tel

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7034 Tel
Judgement Date : 27 December, 2022

Telangana High Court
M/S Abdul Waheed Khan Kirana And ... vs The State Of Telangana on 27 December, 2022
Bench: K.Surender
                HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
     CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.11174, 11189, 11137, 10728 and 11286 OF
                                2022

COMMON ORDER:
1.

Criminal Petition No.11174 of 2022 is filed by the petitioner to

quash the proceedings against him in PR.No.59 of 2017, dated

15.02.2017 for the offence under Section 34(E) of A.P.Excise Act,

1968 on the file of Prohibition & Excise Station, Nirmal.

2. Criminal Petition No.11189 of 2022 is filed by the petitioner

seeking to quash the proceedings against him in PR.No.9 of 2018,

dated 24.01.2018 for the offence under Section 34(E) of A.P.Excise

Act, 1968 on the file of Police Station Kadam.

3. Criminal Petition No.11137 of 2022 is filed by the petitioner

seeking to quash the proceedings against him in PR.No.137 of

2022, dated 12.05.2022 for the offence under Sections 7(A) r/w 8(e)

of A.P.Prohibition Act, 1995 and 34(E) of A.P.Excise Act, 1968 on

the file of Prohibition & Excise Station, Nirmal.

4. Criminal Petition No.10728 of 2022 is filed by the petitioner

seeking to quash the proceedings against him in PR.No.305 of

2016, dated 22.09.2016 for the offence under Section 34(E) of

A.P.Excise Act, 1968 on the file of Prohibition & Excise Station,

Nirmal.

5. Criminal Petition No.11286 of 2022 is filed by the petitioner

seeking to quash the proceedings against it filed in PR.No.386 of

2016, dated 05.12.2016 for the offence under Section 34(E) of

A.P.Excise Act, 1968 on the file of Prohibition & Excise Station,

Nirmal.

6. The petitioner in all the cases is the same, as such all the

cases are disposed by way of this Common Order.

7. According to the police, the petitioner has sold varying

quantities of jaggery, black jaggery and alum for the purpose of

preparing ID liquor in all the cases. This petitioner has knowledge

that the said jaggery and alum are used for the purpose of

preparing ID liquor. In some cases ID liquor was also seized.

8. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the office

of the Commissioner of Prohibition & Excise, vide

CR.No.4294/DPF/2001/C5, dated 22.12.2001 on the basis of the

judgment in W.P.No.1970 of 2000, has instructed the Excise

authorities not to cause any undue harassment whatsoever in

respect of genuine trade transactions of black jaggery covered by

valid permits.

9. The Full Bench of this Court in the case reported in the case of

Ganesh Traders (Kirana and General Merchants), Dhermapuri v.

District Collector, Karimnagar and others in W.P.No.19706 of

2000 and batch reported in 2002 (1) ALD 210 (FB) held that when

there is reasonable apprehension by the authorities that the black

jaggery and alum are used to make ID liquor, then case can be

registered under Section 34 (c) of the A.P.Excise Act. The

reasonable belief in each case would depend on the prevailing

circumstances of a particular case. Merely being in possession of

black jaggery and alum, when they are permitted to sell under a

valid permit, cannot be construed as the jaggery was meant for

preparing ID liquor.

10. Learned counsel appearing for petitioner in all these cases

would submit that in fact, the petitioner is the proprietor of

M/s.Abdul Waheed Khan Kirana & General Merchants. A false case

has been deliberately registered against the petitioner and he has

nothing to do with any illicit distillation. Petitioner cannot be

mulcted with the criminal liability under the Excise Act, if the

purchase of the jaggery from him was used in the preparation of ID

liquor.

11. In all the five cases, the petitioner is suspected of providing

black jaggery and alum for the purpose of preparing ID liquor. In

the said circumstances, when the cases are under investigation,

this Court cannot decide on the fact whether the petitioner had

knowledge about such preparation of ID liquor and has provided

jaggery in collusion or the purchasers misused the jaggery and

alum purchased from the petitioner. These are all questions which

can be decided only during the investigation and consequent trial if

any.

12. For the reasons stated above, all the Criminal Petitions are

dismissed. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any,

shall stand closed.

__________________ K.SURENDER, J Date:27 .12.2022 kvs

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.11174, 11189, 11137, 10728 and 11286 OF

Date: 27.12.2022.

kvs

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter