Monday, 13, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The State Of Telangana vs Maddoor Bhargav Ram Naidu
2021 Latest Caselaw 2756 Tel

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2756 Tel
Judgement Date : 23 September, 2021

Telangana High Court
The State Of Telangana vs Maddoor Bhargav Ram Naidu on 23 September, 2021
Bench: Shameem Akther
         THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER

     CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.3100, 5995, 5997, 6003 and
                      6004 of 2021

COMMON ORDER:

      Since facts of the case and the issue involved in all these

Criminal Petitions are similar, all these Criminal Petitions are taken

up together and being disposed of by this common order.


2.    Criminal Petition No.3100/2021 is filed by the petitioner/State

under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C, seeking to cancel the anticipatory bail

granted to the respondent/A.4 vide order dated 30.03.2021 passed

in Crl.M.P.No.730/2021 (Crime No.6/2021 of Bownepally Police

Station), by the learned Special Judge for trial of offences under

SCs & STs (POA) Act-cum-VI Additional Metropolitan Sessions

Judge, Secunderabad.

3. Criminal Petition Nos.5997 and 6003/2021 are filed by the

petitioner/State under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C, seeking to cancel the

anticipatory bail granted to the respondents/unnamed accused vide

common order dated 09.03.2021 passed by this Court in Criminal

Petition Nos.800 and 804 of 2021.

4. Criminal Petition Nos.5995 and 6004/2021 are filed by the

petitioner/State under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C, seeking to cancel the

anticipatory bail granted to the respondent/A.2 and respondent/

A.3, respectively, vide common order dated 09.03.2021 passed by

this Court in Criminal Petition Nos.830 and 893 of 2021.

5. Heard both sides. Perused the record.

6. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the

petitioners/State in all these Criminal Petitions inter alia contended

that the respondents in Criminal Petition Nos.5995, 5997, 6003 and

6004 of 2021/accused have intentionally not appeared before the

Station House concerned on some dates in May, 2021 and July,

2021, which shows their utter disregard to the orders of the Court.

Further, the respondents/accused are not cooperating with

investigation of case and not revealing any information, and

thereby flouting the orders of the Court and therefore, the bails

granted in favour of the respondents/accused may be cancelled by

allowing the Criminal Petitions as prayed for.

7. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents in all

these Criminal Petitions/accused would contend that there is no

truth in the contention of the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor

that the respondents/accused are not appearing before the Station

House Officer concerned regularly, as directed by this Court. The

respondents/accused are strictly complying with the bail conditions.

There is nothing to accede the request of the petitioners/State to

cancel the anticipatory bail granted in favour of the respondents/

accused and ultimately prayed to dismiss all these Criminal

Petitions.

8. In view of the above submissions, the point for determination

in these Criminal Petitions is:

"Whether the petitioners/State has made out valid grounds to cancel the bails granted in favour of the respondents in all these Criminal Petitions/ accused by exercising the power under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.?"

9. POINT: As seen from the material placed on record, the

respondent in Crl.P.No.3100 of 2021/A.4 was granted anticipatory

bail vide order dated 30.03.2021 passed in Crl.M.P.No.730/2021 in

Crime No.6/2021 of Bowenpally Police Station, by the learned

Special Judge for trial of offences under SCs & STs (POA) Act-cum-

VI Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Secunderabad, on the

following conditions:

"The petitioner/A.4 is directed to surrender before concerned learned Magistrate on or before 30.04.2021. Upon his surrender, he shall be released on bail on personal bond for Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) with two sureties for like sum. Petitioner/A.4 shall appear before the S.H.O, P.S. Bowenpally, on every Saturday between 10.00AM to 2.00PM till filing of the charge sheet. The petitioner/A.4 shall not misuse the liberty granted to him, failing which the Court concerned shall take appropriate action in accordance with law in the light of the judgment of the Apex Court in Sushila Agarwal and others vs. State (NCT of Delhi) and others (2020 SCC Online 98). The petitioner/A4 shall also comply with the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. If the petitioner/A.4 fails to appear before the Court for judicial process without leave of the Court and in the event of issuance of Non-Bailable Warrant, this bail stands automatically cancelled and the self and surety bonds will be forfeited. He shall also give an undertaking that he informs change of address, if any to police and Court as well"

10. The respondents in Crl.P.Nos.5997 & 6003 of 2021/unnamed

accused were granted anticipatory bail by this Court, vide common

order, dated 09.03.2021, passed in Criminal Petition Nos.800 and

804 of 2021 on the following conditions:

"(i) The petitioners shall execute a personal bond to the tune of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) each with two sureties each to the like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer.

(ii) The petitioners shall appear personally before the S.H.O, Bowenpally Police Station on every Saturday between 10.00 AM and 2.00 PM, till filing of the charge sheet.

(iii) The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such fact to the Investigating Authority.

(iv) The petitioners shall not act in any manner which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious investigation.

(v) The petitioners shall also comply with the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C."

11. Further, the respondent in Crl.P.No.5995 of 2021/A.2 and

respondent in Crl.P.No.6004 of 2021/A.3, were also granted

anticipatory bail by this Court vide common order, dated

09.03.2021, passed in Criminal Petition Nos.830 and 893 of 2021,

on the following conditions:

"(i) The petitioners are directed to surrender before the Station House Officer, Bowenpally Police Station, Secunderabad, within a period of fifteen days from today, and on such surrender, they shall be released on bail on their executing personal bond to the tune of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) each with two sureties each to the like amount to the satisfaction.

(ii) The petitioners shall personally appear before the S.H.O, Bowenpally Police Station on every Saturday between 10.00 AM and 2.00 PM, till filing of the charge sheet, particularly the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer as stipulated under Section 438(2)(i) of Cr.P.C.

(iii) The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such fact to the Investigating Authority.

(iv) The petitioners shall not act in any manner which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious investigation.

(v) The petitioners shall surrender their passports, if any, before the Court concerned and their passports will remain in the custody of the Court concerned until further orders. The petitioners shall not leave the Country without prior permission of the Court concerned.

(vi) The petitioners shall not misuse the liberty granted to them, failing which the Court concerned shall take appropriate action in accordance with law in the light of the judgment of the Apex Court in Sushila Agarwal and others vs. State (NCT of Delhi) and others (2020 SCC Online SC 98)

(vii) The petitioners shall remain present in person before the trial Court on each date of hearing. If in the opinion of the trial Court, default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail granted to the petitioners and proceed against them in accordance with law.

(viii) The petitioners shall also comply with the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C."

12. All the aforesaid orders were passed assigning reasons. Later,

A.2 (respondent in Crl.P.No.5995 of 2021) filed I.A.No.2 of 2021 in

Crl.P.No.830 of 2021 and A.3 (respondent in Crl.P.No.6004 of

2021) filed I.A.No.2 of 2021 in Crl.P.No.893 of 2021 before this

Court, seeking to relax bail condition imposed against them. This

Court vide separate orders of even date, dated 01.07.2021,

modified the condition and directed A.2 and A.3 to personally

appear before the Investigating authority on every third Saturday

till completion of the investigation and filing of charge sheet/final

report.

13. The respondents in Crl.P.Nos.5997 and 6003 of 2021

(unnamed accused) also filed I.A.No.3 of 2021 in Crl.P.No.800 of

2021 and I.A.No.3 of 2021 in Crl.P.No.804 of 2021 respectively,

before this Court, seeking to relax the bail condition imposed

against them. This Court vide separate orders of the even date,

dated 01.06.2021, modified the bail condition and directed the said

unnamed accused to appear before the Station House Officer

concerned on 4th Saturday of every month, till filing of the charge

sheet.

14. It is brought to the notice of this Court that all the accused in

these Criminal Petitions, i.e., respondents/unnamed accused and

the respondents/A.2 to A.4 are complying with the bail conditions.

15. It is pertinent to state that grant or cancellation of bail is the

discretion of the Court. The very purpose of imposing conditions

while granting bail is to ensure that the accused do not flee away

from justice. Furthermore, it is mandatory on the part of the

accused to comply with the bail conditions. In the instant case,

except contending that the respondents/accused are not complying

with the bail conditions, no scrap of paper is produced to

substantiate the same. There are no circumstances to accede the

request of the petitioners in these Criminal Petitions/State and

cancel the bail applications of the accused by exercising power

under Section 439(2) of Cr.P.C. However, in view of the peculiar

facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it appropriate

to order as follows:

"The respondents in all these Criminal Petitions/ accused are directed to appear before the Station House Officer, Bowenpally Police Station, on third Saturday of every month, between 10.00AM and 5.00PM, till filing of the charge sheet."

17. With the above observations and modification, these Criminal

Petitions are disposed of.

Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in these Criminal

Petitions shall stand closed.

______________________ Dr. SHAMEEM AKTHER, J Date: 23.09.2021 scs

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Media

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter