Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3642 Tel
Judgement Date : 19 November, 2021
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
WRIT APPEAL No.3 of 2010
JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma)
The present writ appeal is of the year 2010.
The facts of the case reveal that the writ petitioner
came up before this Court stating that it has purchased
the land to an extent of 971.57 square yards bearing
premises No.7-1-621 forming part of survey No.25 and
26 of Srinivasanagar Colony, Ameerpet, Hyderabad. It
was stated that the second respondent put fencing over
the land of the writ petitioner as if it was acquired in the
year 1987.
The disputed question of fact i.e., whether the land
which is being claimed by the Commissioner, Hyderabad
Metropolitan Development Authority is a private land or
not, came up before the learned Single Judge. The
learned Single Judge has disposed of the writ petition
with a liberty to parties to work out their remedies by
approaching the civil court.
In the considered opinion of this Court, the disputes
relating to title, possession and grant of injunction can
be looked into by the civil court and not by this Court in
exercise of writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India. The learned Single Judge was
justified in disposing of the writ petition giving liberty to
the parties to approach the civil court and no case is
made out in the matter.
The writ appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand
closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
___________________________ SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, CJ
___________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J 19.11.2021 vs
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!