Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3568 Tel
Judgement Date : 18 November, 2021
THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
Criminal Appeal No.939 of 2008
JUDGMENT:
This Criminal Appeal is filed by the appellant/complainant
under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C, challenging the judgment dated
08.04.2008 passed in C.C.No.2143 of 2005 by the learned X
Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad, at Malkajgiri, wherein the
Court below acquitted the respondent Nos.1 to 3/Accused Nos.1 to
3 for the offence punishable under Section 138 r/w 142 of N.I. Act.
2. Heard the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for
respondent No.2-State and perused the record.
3. No representation for the appellant. On earlier occasion also,
there was no representation for the appellant and hence, the
matter was posted "for orders" today. Even then there is no
representation for the appellant. It appears that the appellant has
no interest to pursue the matter.
4. Under these circumstances, this Criminal Appeal is dismissed
for default.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal
Appeal, shall stand closed.
______________________ Dr. SHAMEEM AKTHER, J Date: 18.11.2021 scs
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!