Monday, 13, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kankanala Bharatha Laxmi vs Palkala Ravinder Reddy
2021 Latest Caselaw 3491 Tel

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3491 Tel
Judgement Date : 16 November, 2021

Telangana High Court
Kankanala Bharatha Laxmi vs Palkala Ravinder Reddy on 16 November, 2021
Bench: A.Venkateshwara Reddy
     THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. VENKATESHWARA REDDY

                           Tr. CMP No.77 of 2020
ORDER:

The petitioner/wife has filed this Transfer Civil Miscellaneous

Petition under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code to withdraw EP No.359

of 2016 in OS No.31 of 2014 pending on the file of the Principal Junior

Civil Judge, Warangal and to transfer the same to any other competent

Junior Civil Judge's Court at Warangal only and to pass any such other

orders.

2. The claim of the petitioner is that she has challenged the orders

passed in IA No.766 of 2016 in OS No.31 of 2014 pending on the file of

the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Warangal before this Court, vide CRP

No.5863 of 2017 wherein this Court is pleased to set aside the orders in IA

No.766 of 2016 and accordingly, when the petitioner has approached for

implementation of the orders in CRP No.5863 of 207, the learned Junior

Civil Judge, Warangal, did not consider the request of the petitioner and

gave long adjournments and has not taken any steps as prayed by the

petitioner. Accordingly, she has suffered mentally and financially and she

apprehends that she may not get justice in the Court of the Principal Junior

Civil Judge at Warangal. For the reasons, she has requested to transfer EP

No.359 of 2016 in OS No.31 of 2014 pending on the file of the Principal

Junior Civil Judge at Warangal to any other competent Junior Civil Judge's

Court at Warangal.

3. Notice was served on the respondent and he remained absent.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the record.

4. IA No.766 of 2016 in OS No.31 of 2014 was filed by the petitioner/

plaintiff on 13.04.2014 to condone the delay of 940 days and to set aside

the ex parte decree dated 14.03.2014. The said application was allowed by

the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Warangal on payment of costs of

Rs.2,000/-, whereas IA No.767 of 2016 was filed under Order IX, Rule 13

of CPC to set aside the ex parte decree dated 14.03.2014 in OS No.31 of

2014. In fact, the petitioner herein has assailed the order in IA No.766 of

2016 before this Court in CRP No.5863 of 2017 and that order was set

aside. Therefore, it appears that the petitioner has approached the trial

Court for execution of the judgment and decree in OS No.31 of 2014 where

the difficulty arose.

5. Now, the contention of the petitioner is that as the Presiding Officer

of the Principal Junior Civil Judge's Court, Warangal failed to consider her

request for short adjournments for execution of the decree in OS No.31 of

2014, she has a reasonable apprehension in her mind that she may not get

justice in the hands of that Court. Except this, the petitioner did not make

any other allegation against the Presiding Officer of that Court.

Accordingly, this Court restrained itself from calling remarks from the

Presiding Officer. On enquiry with the Unit Head, it is found that the very

same Presiding Officer is continuing in the Court of Principal Junior Civil

Judge at Warangal.

6. Section 24 of CPC deals with the general power of transfer and

withdrawal by the High Court and the District Courts. This section confers

a general power to transfer, withdraw any suit or appeals or other

proceedings at any stage on an application of a party. Such proceeding can

only be ordered when the party has reasonable apprehension that justice

may be denied to him. Though mere suspicion of the party that she may

not get justice did not constitute a valid ground, in my considered opinion,

as the order passed by the Court below in IA No.766 of 2016 was set aside

by this Court in CRP No.5863 of 2017 and that the petitioner has expressed

any apprehension that she approached the Court below for execution of the

decree in OS No.31 of 2014, the Presiding Officer failed to consider her

request for short adjournments, I deem it fit to transfer EP No.359 of 2016

from the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Warangal to any other

competent Junior Civil Judge's Court at Warangal Head Quarters.

7. In the result, the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed

and EP No.359 of 2016 in OS No.31 of 2014 pending on the file of the

Principal Junior Civil Judge, Warangal, is ordered to be withdrawn and

transfer the same to the VI Additional Junior Civil Judge's Court at

Warangal for disposal in accordance with law. The learned VI Additional

Junior Civil Judge, Warangal shall take all possible steps for disposal of EP

No.359 of 2016 at the earliest possible, not later than six months from the

date of receipt of a copy of this order. The learned Principal Junior Civil

Judge, Warangal, shall transmit the entire record duly indexed, immediately

after receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs.

8. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this petition shall also

stand dismissed.

_______________________________ A. VENKATESHWARA REDDY, J.

Date: 16.11.2021 Isn

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter