Monday, 20, May, 2024
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S, Siare Technologies vs The Government Of Telangana
2021 Latest Caselaw 195 Tel

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 195 Tel
Judgement Date : 29 January, 2021

Telangana High Court
M/S, Siare Technologies vs The Government Of Telangana on 29 January, 2021
Bench: M.S.Ramachandra Rao, T.Amarnath Goud
      HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
                                        AND
         HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD

                  WRIT PETITION NO.24107 OF 2020

                                    O R D E R:

(Per Sri Justice M.S.Ramachandra Rao)

The petitioner has challenged the Assessment Order

A.O.No.28643 dt.13.03.2020 for the period April, 2015 to March, 2016

and the consequent demand notice dt.15.03.2020 issued by the 3rd

respondent apart from the garnishee notice dt.16.11.2020 issued by the

3rd respondent to its banker.

2. The petitioner contends that it received a show-cause notice from

the 3rd respondent and filed objections thereto online on 22.01.2020; that

the 3rd respondent called upon the petitioner to attend personal hearing

on 11.03.2020; that the petitioner could not attend the same but its

Branch Manager appeared and submitted certain documents in support

of its CST Returns and requested further time for submission of C-Forms

relating to inter-State sales since the same had to be secured from

different States and different dealers/customers; that the 3rd respondent

orally informed the representative of the petitioner that the next date of

hearing would be intimated, but suddenly the impugned Assessment

Order passed by the 3rd respondent was received by the petitioner on

16.03.2020 without mentioning that time was sought by petitioner for

submitting C-Forms for inter-State sales.

3. The petitioner contends that a garnishee notice dt.16.11.2020 was

issued under Section 29 of the TVAT Act, 2005 to the petitioner's

banker and the bank account of the petitioner was frozen by the bank; 2

the petitioner then gave a letter dt.03.12.2020 agreeing to pay 25% of the

tax liability to unfreeze the bank account and also issued two post dated

cheques dt.29.12.2020 and 20.01.2021 for Rs.5,00,000/- each intimating

that the petitioner is proposing to challenge the Assessment Order and

seek reassessment. The petitioner also stated that it had paid a sum of

Rs.3,33,364/- without prejudice to their rights and that subsequently the

3rd respondent had revoked, through a letter dt.04.12.2020, the garnishee

notice dt.16.11.2020.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner therefore prays for setting aside

of the impugned assessment and remand of the matter to the 3rd

respondent so that the petitioner may file the statutory 'C' Declaration

Forms which the petitioner is able to secure and claim concessional rate

of tax.

5. It is not in dispute that even after passing of the Assessment Order

in terms of Rule 12(7) of the CST (Registration & Turnover) Rules,

1957 as interpreted by this Court in Godrej Agrovet Limited Vs. CTO,

Eluru1, the 3rd respondent has power to consider 'C' Declaration Forms

and if they are considered, there would be a reduction in the liability of

the petitioner to pay the CST.

6. Sri M.Govind Reddy, learned Special Counsel for Commercial

Taxes appearing for the respondents states that the 3rd respondent would

give an opportunity to the petitioner to file the 'C' Declaration Forms

which were not available prior to passing of the impugned Assessment

Order and that the matter be remitted back to the 3rd respondent.

1 7 VST 703 (AP) : 41 APSTJ 92 3

7. In view of the Judgment in Godrej Agrovet Limited (1 supra),

we are of the opinion that in the interests of justice the impugned

Assessment Order A.O.No.28643 dt.13.03.2020 deserves to be set aside.

8. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed; the impugned

Assessment Order A.O.No.28643 dt.13.03.2020 passed by the 3rd

respondent is set aside; the matter is remitted back to the 3rd respondent

for fresh consideration; the petitioner is granted six (6) weeks time from

the date of receipt of a copy of this order to file 'C' Declaration Forms if

not already filed before the 3rd respondent; a personal hearing shall be

afforded to the petitioner by the 3rd respondent; and then a reasoned

order shall be passed by the 3rd respondent in accordance with law and

communicated to the petitioner. No costs.

9. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this Writ Petition shall

stand closed.

____________________________ M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J

_______________________ T.AMARNATH GOUD, J Date:29-01-2021

Svv

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 
 
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2024

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2024', Apply Now!

 
 
 
 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

Publish Your Article

Campus Ambassador

Media Partner

Campus Buzz