Sunday, 19, May, 2024
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jayarapu Srinivasulu vs The State Of T.S
2021 Latest Caselaw 181 Tel

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 181 Tel
Judgement Date : 28 January, 2021

Telangana High Court
Jayarapu Srinivasulu vs The State Of T.S on 28 January, 2021
Bench: K.Lakshman
               THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

                    CRIMINAL PETITION No.14 of 2021

ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of

Cr.P.C. to quash the proceedings in Crime No.240 of 2020,

pending on the file of Station House Officer, Chityal, Nalgonda

District against the petitioner/Accused. The offences alleged

against the petitioner are under Sections 272, 273 and 420 of

IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned

Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the subject

matter is squarely covered by a common order in Chidurala

Shyamsubder v. State of Telangana1 rendered by the High

Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana

and the State of Andhra Pradesh, and placed copy of the said

judgment for perusal.

3. In Chidurala Shyamsubder's case (supra), a learned

Single Judge of the High Court, following the guidelines laid

down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Haryana v.

Bhajan Lal2, held that the Police are incompetent to take

cognizance of the offences punishable under Sections 45 and

59(1) of the Food Safety and Standards (FSS) Act, 2006,

investigating into the offences along with other offences under

the provisions of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and filing

1 Crl.P.No.3731 of 2018 & batch, decided on 27.08.2018 2 1992 Supp. (1) SCC 335 2

charge sheet is grave illegality, as the Food Officer alone is

competent to investigate and to file charge sheet following the

Rules laid down under Sections 41 and 42 of FSS Act,

whereas, in the present case, the Police have registered the

crime for the offences under Sections 272, 273 and 420 of

IPC. Therefore, the said proceedings in Crime No.240 of 2020

against the petitioner herein are contrary to the principle held

by the learned Single Judge of the High Court in Chidurala

Shyamsubder (supra) and, accordingly, the same are liable to

be quashed.

4. In view of the above submission, the present Criminal

Petition is allowed in terms of the judgment in Chidurala

Shyamsubder (supra), and the proceedings in Crime No.240

of 2020, pending on the file of of Station House Officer,

Chityal, Nalgonda District, are hereby quashed against the

petitioner/Accused.

5. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner

that the seized property is in the custody of Police, Chityal

Police Station and sought direction to the Station House

Officer, Chityal Police Station, Nalgonda District, to return the

seized property to the petitioner.

6. Since the proceedings in Crime No.240 of 2020 are

quashed against the petitioner/Accused, the Police, Chityal

Police Station, Nalgonda District, are directed to return the

seized property i.e., 9000 Gutka 3 Big Packets, each packet 3

containing 65 small sachets, on verifying the documents with

regard to ownership of the said property. Miscellaneous

petitions, if any, pending in this Petition, shall stand closed.

________________________ JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN Date: 28.01.2021 Dv

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 
 
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2024

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2024', Apply Now!

 
 
 
 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

Publish Your Article

Campus Ambassador

Media Partner

Campus Buzz