Saturday, 11, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

S. Madan vs The State Of Telangana
2021 Latest Caselaw 487 Tel

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 487 Tel
Judgement Date : 19 February, 2021

Telangana High Court
S. Madan vs The State Of Telangana on 19 February, 2021
Bench: G Sri Devi
           THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI

                  WRIT PETITION No.26770 OF 2019

ORDER:

This Writ Petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of

India, is filed by the petitioners/A.2 to A.4 questioning the action

of the respondents in not closing rowdy sheet opened against them

on 21.01.2013 on the file of 3rd respondent-Bollaram Police

Station.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the

respondents.

3. The grievance of the petitioners is that a rowdy sheet has

been opened against them on 21.01.2013 on the file of 3rd

respondent-Bollaram Police Station based on a single compliant,

which was registered as a case in Crime No.85 of 2012 for the

offence punishable under Section 436 of the Indian Penal Code,

which ultimately resulted in acquittal of the petitioners by the

Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for trial of Communal

Offence Cases-cum-VII Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge,

Hyderabad, vide its Judgment, dated 01.10.2015, in Sessions Case

No.355 of 2014.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that this

Court has already closed the rowdy sheet opened against accused

No.1 in Crime No.85 of 2012 and the case of the petitioners also

stands on the same footing. He further stated that except the

aforesaid crime, there is no crime registered against the petitioners

GSD,J wp_26770_2019

and ultimately, prayed this Court to close the rowdy sheet opened

against the petitioners herein on 21.01.2013.

5. A counter affidavit has been filed by respondent No.3,

wherein it is stated that Crime No.85 of 2012 was registered on the

file of Bollaram Police Station against the petitioners herein and

another under Section 436 I.P.C, which resulted in acquittal, as

stated above.

6. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home submits

that the main intention of the petitioners are to get the rowdy sheet

closed against them so that they would continue their unlawful

activities and as such no indulgence by this Court is required to be

shown.

7. Insofar as opening of a rowdy sheet is concerned, the learned

counsel for the petitioners drew the attention of this Court to the

Judgment reported in M.Malla Reddy v. State of Telangana and

others1, wherein this Court had gone into the details as to when a

rowdy sheet can be opened and continued. This Court in the said

decision had considered in detail the relevant provision for the

purpose of adjudication of the issue and by referring to the

A.P Police Standing Order-601 had indicated in what

circumstances, a rowdy sheet can be opened. The Hon'ble Court

further observed that except in cases, which are covered by the

exceptions provided under the said Standing Orders, for a mere

single offence, the authorities are not empowered to open a rowdy

sheet. He also submitted that persons who habitually commit,

attempt to commit or abet the commission of offence involving a

2016 (1) ALD (Crl.) 591

GSD,J wp_26770_2019

breach of the peace, disturbance to public order and security, a

rowdy sheet can be opened.

8. In the present case, since the offence with which the

petitioners are charged is under Section 436 I.P.C., which is one of

the exceptions carved out for opening of a rowdy sheet, the

contention of the petitioners that for a single offence, rowdy sheet

cannot be opened does not merit consideration. However,

considering the fact that the said complaint, which resulted in a

case being registered as Sessions Case No.355 of 2014, was ended

in acquittal on 01.10.2015 and no other cases are pending against

the petitioners as per the counter of respondent No.3, interference

of this Court is called for, as there is no requirement to continue

the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioner on 21.01.2013.

Therefore, the rowdy sheet opened against the petitioners is liable

to be closed.

9. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed and the rowdy sheet

opened against the petitioners on 21.01.2013 by the 3rd

respondent-Station House Officer, Bollaram Police Station in

respect of Crime No.85 of 2012, is hereby closed. No costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

_______________________ JUSTICE G SRI DEVI 19th February, 2021

YVL

GSD,J wp_26770_2019

THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI

WRIT PETITION No.26770 OF 2019

Date:19.02.2021

YVL

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Media

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter