Monday, 20, May, 2024
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mohd Mazaruddin And 8 Others vs The State Of Telangana
2021 Latest Caselaw 273 Tel

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 273 Tel
Judgement Date : 3 February, 2021

Telangana High Court
Mohd Mazaruddin And 8 Others vs The State Of Telangana on 3 February, 2021
Bench: K.Lakshman
               THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

                    CRIMINAL PETITION No.5475 of 2020

ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to

quash the proceedings in Crime No.381 of 2020, pending on the file

of Station House Officer, P.S.Afzalgunj, Hyderabad, against the

petitioners/Accused. The offences alleged against the petitioners are

under Sections 272, 273, 336 r/w.109 of IPC, Section 20(2) of

COPTA.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned

Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the subject matter is

squarely covered by a common order in Chidurala Shyamsubder v.

State of Telangana1 rendered by the High Court of Judicature at

Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra

Pradesh, and placed copy of the said judgment for perusal.

3. In Chidurala Shyamsubder's case (supra), a learned Single

Judge of the High Court, following the guidelines laid down by the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal2, held

that the Police are incompetent to take cognizance of the offences

punishable under Sections 45 and 59(1) of the Food Safety and

Standards (FSS) Act, 2006, investigating into the offences along with

other offences under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code, 1860,

1 Crl.P.No.3731 of 2018 & batch, decided on 27.08.2018 2 1992 Supp. (1) SCC 335 2

and filing charge sheet is grave illegality, as the Food Officer alone is

competent to investigate and to file charge sheet following the Rules

laid down under Sections 41 and 42 of FSS Act, whereas, in the

present case, the Police have registered the crime for the offences

under Sections 272, 273, 336 r/w.109 of IPC, Section 20(2) of

COPTA. Therefore, the said proceedings in Crime No.381 of 2020

against the petitioners herein are contrary to the principle held by the

learned Single Judge of the High Court in Chidurala Shyamsubder

(supra) and, accordingly, the same are liable to be quashed.

4. In view of the above submission, the present Criminal Petition

is allowed in terms of the judgment in Chidurala Shyamsubder

(supra), and the proceedings in Crime No.381 of 2020, pending on the

file of Station House Officer, Afzalgunj, Hyderabad, are hereby

quashed against the petitioners/Accused.

5. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the

seized property is in the custody of Police, Afzalgunj Police Station

and sought direction to the Station House Officer, Afzalgunj Police

Station, Hyderabad to return the seized property to the petitioners.

6. Since the proceedings in Crime No.381 of 2020 are quashed

against the petitioners/Accused, the Police, Afzalgunj Police Station,

Hyderabad, are directed to return the seized property i.e. Rani

Premium Gutkha (10) big bags and Auto Paiggio vehicle bearing 3

No.TS-12-UP-9690, on verifying the documents with regard to

ownership of the said property.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

________________________ JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

Date: 03.02.2021

ajr

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 
 
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2024

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2024', Apply Now!

 
 
 
 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

Publish Your Article

Campus Ambassador

Media Partner

Campus Buzz