[Cites 0, Cited by 0]
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Vijay Singh Gurjar vs The State Of Rajasthan ... on 25 March, 2026
[2026:RJ-JD:14027]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6497/2026
1. Vijay Singh Gurjar S/o Shriman Singh Gurjar, Aged About
41 Years, Resident Of Kasane Ka Nagla, Hukmi Khera,
Karauli
2. Lokendra Singh Shaktawat S/o Shri Narayan Singh
Shaktawat,, Aged About 43 Years, Resident Of G-2, New
Bapu Nagar, Bhilwara
3. Jalil Ahamed Sheikh S/o Shri Anwar Ahamed Sheikh,
Aged About 43 Years, Sheikh Mohalla, Asind, Bhilwara.
4. Madan La Kuri S/o Shri Gopal Singh Kuri, Aged About 44
Years, R/o Dhani Panawali, Kasarda, Po Jajod, Sikar
5. Mahendra Singh Kanawat S/o Shri Ratan Singh Kanawat,
Aged About 39 Years, R/o Sadhuo Ki Gali, Nai Rajyasm,
Deoriya, Bhilwara.
6. Sheetal Singh S/o Shri Darav Singh, Aged About 40
Years, R/o Konrer, Deeg, Bharatpur.
7. Jai Singh S/o Shri Balwant Singh, Aged About 43 Years,
R/o Kamal Nagar, Ward No 14, Jhunjhunun.
8. Kavita Purohit W/o Shri Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Aged
About 40 Years, R/o 949-K, Mali Mohalla, Kachhola,
Bhilwara
9. Jitendra Singh S/o Shri Gopal Singh, Aged About 40
Years, R/o Village Raghunath Gadh, Post Badla Kala Talab,
Tehsil Bhinai, Ajmer
10. Bhupendra Singh Chouhan S/o Pratap Singh Chouhan,
Aged About 38 Years, R/o G-75, Police Line, Bhilwara
11. Jai Prakash Sharma S/o Shri Mohan Lal Sharma, Aged
About 38 Years, R/o Ward No 02, Villaged/post-Biharipur,
Tehsil-Neem Ka Thana , Sikar.
12. Salim Mohammed Sheikh S/o Shri Shyed Mohammed,
Aged About 51 Years, R/o Shaikh Ji Ka Khera, Mandal,
Bhilwara.
13. Lokesh Sharma S/o Shri Khem Chand Sharma, Aged
About 39 Years, R/o 9 Ramnagar, 60 Ft. Road, Alwar
14. Karan Singh Chundawat S/o Shri Girdhari Singh
Chundawat, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Near Police Line,
Behind Maharaj Ki Hotel, Shiv Nagar, Bhilwara.
(Uploaded on 25/03/2026 at 03:47:28 PM)
(Downloaded on 25/03/2026 at 08:49:06 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:14027] (2 of 3) [CW-6497/2026]
15. Pinky Acharya W/o Shri Hanuman Acharya, Aged About
41 Years, R/o 434, C-Near New Temple, Bholi Road,
Village Haled, Bhilwara.
16. Jayant Sinsinwar S/o Shri Rammo Singh, Aged About 43
Years, R/o Post Hatheni, Village Jiroli, Chiksana,
Bharatpur.
17. Arun Pratap Singh S/o Shri Inder Singh, Aged About 39
Years, R/o Mundiya Khera, Alwar.
18. Bhavani Singh Deshwal S/o Shri Ramchandra Deshwal,
Aged About 39 Years, R/o Dhani Bubriyawali, Mawanda
Hurd Sikar.
19. Sunil Badsara S/o Shri Banwari Lal, Aged About 39 Years,
R/o Ward No 07, Hidayat Nagar, Dayara, Khandela, Sikar.
20. Anirudha Singh S/o Shri Mool Singh Khiriya, Aged About
36 Years, R/o Ajmer Road, Hari Om Colony, Kekri, Ajmer
----Petitioners
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary,
Department Of Home Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan,
Jaipur.
2. The Director General Of Police, Headquarters, Jaipur
3. The Inspector General Of Police, Ajmer Range, Ajmer
4. The Suprintendent Of Police, Bhilwara
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sushil Solanki
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT
Order
25/03/2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner
would be satisfied if an appropriate direction is issued to
respondents to consider petitioner's representation to post
(Uploaded on 25/03/2026 at 03:47:28 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:14027] (3 of 3) [CW-6497/2026]
petitioner at a nearby place, in accordance with law, where
concerned post is lying vacant.
2. Present writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with
directions to petitioner to submit a fresh representation before the
competent authority pointing out vacant posts, within a period of
two weeks from today, alongwith photostat copy of earlier
representation and certified copy of instant order.
3. In case, such representation is filed by petitioner, the
competent authority shall decide the same, in accordance with
law, preferably within a period of six weeks from the receipt
thereof.
4. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the
representation has been issued only with a view to ensure
expeditious redressal of petitioner's grievances. The same may not
be construed to be an order to decide said representation in any
particular manner.
5. Stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.
(SANJEET PUROHIT),J
158-JatinS/-
(Uploaded on 25/03/2026 at 03:47:28 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
