Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2662 Raj
Judgement Date : 18 February, 2026
[2026:RJ-JD:8937]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 342/2026
Bunty S/o Shri Teru Charpota, Aged About 29 Years, R/o
Sarpota, Police Station- Patan, District Banswara Rajasthan. (At
Present Confined At District Jail Banswara)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradhyuman Singh for
Mr. Vijay Gaur
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hanuman Singh Prajapat, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL BENIWAL
Order
18/02/2026
1. This application for bail has been filed by the petitioner under
Section 483 of BNSS (old Section 439 of Cr.P.C.) in connection
with FIR No. 108/2025 dated 08.09.2025, Police Station Patan
(Banswara), District Banswara, for the offences under Sections
191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 119(2), 125, 76, 308(2), 324(4), 324(5),
326(g), 351(2), 351(3), 352 and 190 of the BNS. After
investigation, offence under Sections 119(1) and 333 of teh BNS,
2023 were added.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
has been falsely implicated in the case and false allegations have
been levelled against him. He further submits that following co-
accused persons have been granted bail:
(Uploaded on 18/02/2026 at 03:19:25 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:8937] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-342/2026]
1. Khum Chand S/o Shri S.B. Criminal Misc. IInd Bail 05.02.2026 Veshiya Application No.339/2026
2. Kalu S/o Shri Veshiya S.B. Criminal Misc. IInd Bail 05.02.2026
3. Bapu S/o Dalhaing Application No. 346/2026
4. Igru S/o Veshiya S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail 06.12.2025
5. Hukiya S/o Igru S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail 07.11.2025
5. Kamlesh S/o Bharat Application No.12100/2025
6. Rama S/o Bapu
7. Dhamriya @ Samriya S/o Badiya
8. Prabhu S/o Khum S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail 17.11.2025 Chand Application No.12914/2025
The role assigned to the present petitioner in the present
crime is not distinguishable from the role assigned to the co-
accused persons. There is no specific role assigned to the present
petitioner and omnibus allegations have been levelled against all
the accused persons. The petitioner is in judicial custody since
27.11.2025 and the trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore,
he deserves to be enlarged on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes this bail
application, however, is not in a position to distinguish the role
assigned to the present petitioner from the role of co-accused-
persons, who have been enlarged on bail.
4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public
Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
5. Having considered the rival submissions, facts and
circumstances of this case so also the fact that the co-accused-
persons namely Khum Chand, Kalu, Bapu, Hukiya, Kamlesh,
Rama, Dhamriya @ Samriya and Prabhu have been granted bail
by a Coordinate Bench of this Court and the role assigned to the
present petitioner in the present crime is not distinguishable from
the role assigned to the co-accused persons, in the considered
(Uploaded on 18/02/2026 at 03:19:25 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:8937] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-342/2026]
opinion of this Court, no fruitful purpose would be served by
keeping the petitioner behind the bars for an indefinite period as
the trial will take sufficiently long time. Thus, without expressing
any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is of the
opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to
be accepted.
6. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 of
BNSS is allowed. It is ordered that petitioner- Bunty S/o Shri
Teru Charpota shall be released on bail in connection with the
aforesaid FIR; provided he executes personal bond in the sum of
Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/-
each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance
before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever
called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.
7. It is however, made clear that findings recorded/observations
made above are for limited purposes of adjudication of bail
application. The trial court shall not get prejudiced by the same.
(SUNIL BENIWAL),J 19-Ashutosh/-
(Uploaded on 18/02/2026 at 03:19:25 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!