Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sangdiya Payal vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jd:8246)
2026 Latest Caselaw 2339 Raj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2339 Raj
Judgement Date : 13 February, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Sangdiya Payal vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jd:8246) on 13 February, 2026

Author: Farjand Ali
Bench: Farjand Ali
[2026:RJ-JD:8246]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                 S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 663/2026

1.       Sangdiya Payal D/o Shri Gobarbhai, Aged About 20 Years,
         R/o Ranjitsinh Bapu Ni Pati, Limbada, Districtbhavnagar,
         Gujrat At Present R/o Mahadevmandir Ke Pass, Digaon,
         District Jalore
2.       Shravan Kumar S/o Shri Ramesh Kumar, Aged About 22
         Years, R/o Mahadev Mandir Ke Pass, Digaon,district Jalore
                                                                       ----Petitioners
                                       Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of
         Home, Government Of Rajasthan,jaipur.
2.       The Superintendent Of Police, Jalore.
3.       The Sho, Police Station, Jalore
4.       The Superintendent Of Police, Surat
5.       The Sho, Police Station, Punagam, Surat.
6.       Shri Gobarbhai S/o Popat Bhai, R/o Ranjitsinh Bapu Ni
         Pati,      Limbada,     District      Bhavnagar,           Gujratat   Present
         Sitanagar Sobdi Budh Bhavani Road,anjani Sociaty, Surat,
         Gujrat
7.       Shri Bala Bhai S/o Popat Bhai, R/o Ranjitsinhbapu Ni Pati,
         Limbada, District Bhavnagar, Gujratat Present Sitanagar
         Sobdi Budh Bhavani Road,anjani Sociaty, Surat, Gujrat
8.       Shri Milan S/o Bala Bhai, R/o Ranjitsinh Bapuni Pati,
         Limbada, District Bhavnagar, Gujrat
9.       Shri Mith S/o Shri Gobarbhai, R/o Ranjitsinhbapu Ni Pati,
         Limbada, District Bhavnagar, Gujrat
10.      Shri Jiga Bhai S/o Kalu Bhai, R/o Ranjitsinhbapu Ni Pati,
         Limbada, District Bhavnagar, Gujrat
11.      Shri Lala Bhai S/o Kalu Bhai, Son Of Kalu Bhai R/o
         Ranjitsinhbapu Ni Pati, Limbada, District Bhavnagar,
         Gujrat
12.      Vishal Bhai S/o Shri Suresh Bhai,, R/o Ahmedabad At
         Present      Sitanagar       Sobdi       Budhbhavani          Road,    Anjani
         Sociaty, Surat, Gujra
13.      Shri Sanjay S/o Vish Bhai, R/o Village Rathi,district
         Bhavnagar, At Present Sitanagar Sobdibudh Bhavani


                         (Uploaded on 13/02/2026 at 05:20:18 PM)
                        (Downloaded on 13/02/2026 at 09:56:28 PM)
 [2026:RJ-JD:8246]                      (2 of 4)                       [CRLW-663/2026]


         Road, Anjani Sociaty, Surat, Gujrat
14.      Shri Hitesh S/o Vish Bhai, R/o Village Rathi,district
         Bhavnagar, At Present Sitanagar Sobdibudh Bhavani
         Road, Anjani Sociaty, Surat, Gujrat
15.      Shri Lala S/o Bhola Bhai, R/o Ranjitsinh Bapuni Pati,
         Limbada, District Bhavnagar, Gujrat
16.      Shri Gopal S/o Bhola Bhai, Bhola Bhai R/o Ranjitsinh
         Bapuni Pati, Limbada, District Bhavnagar, Gujra
17.      Shri Sava S/o Bhola Bhai, R/o Ranjitsinh Bapuni Pati,
         Limbada, District Bhavnagar, Gujrat
18.      Shri Bharat S/o Bhola Bhai, R/o Ranjitsinhbapu Ni Pati,
         Limbada, District Bhavnagar, Gujrat
19.      Shri Raju Bhai S/o Kasin Bhai, R/o Ranjitsinhbapu Ni Pati,
         Limbada, District Bhavnagar, Gujrat
20.      Shri Kalu Bhai S/o Kasin Bhai, R/o Ranjitsinhbapu Ni Pati,
         Limbada, District Bhavnagar, Gujrat
21.      Shri Arjun S/o Kana Bhai, R/o Village Sochra,district
         Bhavnagar, At Present Vadodra, Gujra
22.      Shri   Abhi    S/o     Unknown,          R/o     Village    Sihore,district
         Bhavnagar, Gujrat
                                                                   ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)           :     Mr. Rakesh Gupta
For Respondent(s)           :     Mr. Shreeram Choudhary, AGA



                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order

13/02/2026

1. The present Criminal Writ Petition has been preferred by the

petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking

issuance of appropriate directions to the official respondents for

providing them protection, on the ground that they apprehend

threat to their life and personal liberty at the hands of the private

respondents.

(Uploaded on 13/02/2026 at 05:20:18 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:8246] (3 of 4) [CRLW-663/2026]

2. As per the pleadings, the petitioners claim to be majors and

of marriageable age and assert that they are living together in

live-in-relationship and have exectuted an agreement to this effect

on 06.02.2026. It is further stated that the private respondents

are opposed to the said relationship and are allegedly extending

threats, giving rise to an apprehension to the life and personal

liberty of the petitioners.

3. Upon perusal of the record, this Court is of the considered

view that the right to life and personal liberty is a fundamental

right guaranteed to every individual under the Constitution, and

the same cannot be compromised under any circumstances. No

person can be deprived of his or her life or personal liberty except

in accordance with the procedure established by law and

apprehension relating to life and personal liberty, if asserted,

deserves to be examined by the competent authority. The

assessment of threat perception and the necessity of protection

are matters falling within the domain of the police authorities, who

are duty bound to ensure maintenance of law and order and to

prevent any person from taking the law into his or her own hands.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed with a direction that

the petitioners shall appear before the

Commissioner/Superintendent of Police concerned within a period

of ten days from today and submit a representation clearly

indicating the persons from whom they apprehend threat or harm.

Upon such appearance, the Commissioner/Superintendent of

Police concerned shall afford an opportunity of hearing to the

petitioners and, if deemed necessary, to the concerned private

respondents, examine the grievance, deliberate over the issue and

(Uploaded on 13/02/2026 at 05:20:18 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:8246] (4 of 4) [CRLW-663/2026]

calibrate the threat perception and, if the circumstances so

warrant, pass appropriate orders in accordance with law so as to

ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners by the private

respondents by taking law into their own hands.

5. It is clarified that this Court has not recorded any definitive

finding with regard to the legitimacy of the relationship claimed by

the petitioners, the validity of the live-in-relationship agreement

or the genuineness of the documents relied upon by them, and all

such aspects shall remain open for enquiry and investigation by

the competent authority, in accordance with law. It is further

made clear that any observation made herein shall not affect any

civil or criminal proceedings, if any, pending or to be initiated in

accordance with law.

6. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

(FARJAND ALI),J 189-poojatak/-

(Uploaded on 13/02/2026 at 05:20:18 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter