Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sunil Kumar vs Harjindra Singh (2025:Rj-Jd:46627)
2025 Latest Caselaw 14509 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 14509 Raj
Judgement Date : 29 October, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Sunil Kumar vs Harjindra Singh (2025:Rj-Jd:46627) on 29 October, 2025

Author: Manoj Kumar Garg
Bench: Manoj Kumar Garg
[2025:RJ-JD:46627]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                     S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 515/2020

Sunil Kumar S/o Shri Ramgopal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o
Village Thirajwala, Tehsil Pilibanga, District Hanumangarh At
Present        Lakhasar,          (9      LKS),       Tehsil-Pilibanga,         District
Hanumangarh.
                                                                         ----Appellant
                                         Versus
1.       Harjindra Singh S/o Santokh Singh, R/o 11 P.S. Police
         Station Raisinghnagar, Tehsil Raisinghnagar, District Sri
         Ganganagar. (Car Driver)
2.       Satnam Singh S/o Shri Bhagat Singh, R/o 22 P.S. Tehsil
         Raisinghnagar, District Sri Ganganagar. (Car Owner)
3.       The     Oriental         Insurance       Company            Limited,   Branch
         Anupgarh, District Sri Ganganagar.
                                                                      ----Respondents


For Appellant(s)              :        Mr. Suryadeep Bishnoi
For Respondent(s)             :        Mr. UCS Singvi



           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

Order

29/10/2025

Instant misc. appeal has been filed by the appellant-claimant

under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, assailing the

impugned judgment & award dated 13.12.2019 passed by learned

Judge, Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, Hanumangarh (hereinafter

referred to as "the learned MACT/Tribunal") in MAC Case

No.123/2017, whereby the learned Tribunal partly allowed the

claim petition filed by the appellant/claimant and awarded a

meager compensation of Rs.2,51,774/-.

Brief facts of the case are that the appellant-complainant

filed a claim petition under Section 166 of MV Act before the

(Uploaded on 30/10/2025 at 03:03:02 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:46627] (2 of 5) [CMA-515/2020]

learned Tribunal seeking compensation for the injuries sustained

by him due to a motor vehicular accident occurred on 16.03.2014.

It was stated in the claim petition that on 16.03.2014, the

appellant along with his cousin Pawan Kumar was going to

Raisinghnagar from his Village Lakhasar on motorcycle No. RJ-13-

SF-0254, at that time, a car bearing No.HR-51-Y-0702 came and

hit the appellant. As a result of which, the appellant and his cousin

fell down and sustained multiple severe injuries. It was averred

that the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving of

respondent No.1, car driver and the appellant sought adequate

compensation for the injuries.

In response, the respondent Nos.1 to 3 have filed their

separate reply to the claim petition, denying the averments of the

claim petition.

Thereafter, on the basis of the pleadings of the parties, the

learned Tribunal framed four issues including the relief.

In order to substantiate the averments made in the claim

petition, the claimant/appellant produced Sunil Kumar, who was

examined as A.W.-1 and exhibited some documents. In defence,

one witness was produced by the respondents, namely Sanjeet

Ghodela, who was examined as NAW-1 and exhibited some

documents.

After hearing the arguments of the parties, the learned

Tribunal partly allowed the claim petition and awarded a meager

compensation of Rs.2,51,774/- in favour of the

appellant/claimant. Hence this civil misc. appeal for enhancement

of compensation.

(Uploaded on 30/10/2025 at 03:03:02 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:46627] (3 of 5) [CMA-515/2020]

While praying for enhancement, learned counsel for the

claimants/appellants submits that the learned Tribunal has erred

in considering the monthly income of the injured as Rs.6,000/- per

month, whereas the monthly income of the injured shall be

calculated with 40% future loss which is equal to Rs.8400/-.

Counsel submits that the learned Tribunal has awarded lower

compensation under the head of disability. It is therefore, prayed

that the amount of compensation awarded by the Tribunal may be

enhanced adequately.

Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent-Insurance

Company while vehemently opposing the prayer of the appellant

has submitted that amount granted by the Tribunal is fair and just.

Therefore, no interference is required in the impugned judgment

and award.

Heard learned counsel for the appellants as well as learned

counsel for the respondents and perused the award impugned.

On perusal of the impugned award, it appears that the

learned Tribunal has rightly awarded Rs.50,414/- for medical

expenses and Rs.30,000/- for medical expenses. However, the

learned Tribunal has committed error in awarding lesser amount of

compensation to the appellant under the head of monthly income

and disability, which are liable to be enhanced in the facts and

circumstances of the case. Accordingly, the re-computation of the

award shall be as under:-

Income                  :       Rs.8,400/- (per month)

Multiplier              :       17

Disability              :       40%


                      (Uploaded on 30/10/2025 at 03:03:02 PM)

 [2025:RJ-JD:46627]                   (4 of 5)                    [CMA-515/2020]



Calculation: 8400 X 12 X 17 X 40/100= Rs.6,85,440/-

Pain and Suffering                        =     Rs.30,000/-

Medical Bills                             =     Rs.50,414/-


Total amount of compensation : Rs.7,65,854/-

Amount awarded by the Tribunal : Rs.2,51,774/-

Enhanced amount : Rs.5,14,080/-

Rs.7,65,854-Rs.2,51,774/- = Rs.5,14,080/- along with

interest @ 9% p.a. from the date 22.09.2017 till the date of

this order.

In view of the above, the amount of compensation awarded

by learned Tribunal is enhanced by Rs.5,14,080/- along with

interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of filing of claim petition till its

realization.

Accordingly, the civil misc. appeal is partly allowed. The

amount of Rs.5,14,080/- (Five Lakh Fourteen Thousand Eighty

rupees only) shall be paid by the Insurance Company to the

appellant-claimant, in addition to the amount already awarded by

the Tribunal vide order dt. 13.12.2019, within a period of four

weeks from today along with interest @ 9% p.m. from the date of

filing of claim petition till its realization. If the enhanced amount

is not paid within the stipulated period, the claimant-appellant

shall be entitled to an interest @ 7% p.a on the said amount. The

amount so deposited by the Insurance Company shall be

(Uploaded on 30/10/2025 at 03:03:02 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:46627] (5 of 5) [CMA-515/2020]

deposited in the Saving Account of the claimants, detail of which

shall be furnished by the claimants before the Tribunal.

Pending applications, if any, also decided.

Record, if received, be sent back immediately.

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J 154-GKaviya/-

(Uploaded on 30/10/2025 at 03:03:02 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter