Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sunny Gurnani vs Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnana ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 14111 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 14111 Raj
Judgement Date : 10 October, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Sunny Gurnani vs Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnana ... on 10 October, 2025

[2025:RJ-JD:44658]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11405/2025

Sunny Gurnani S/o Shri Kishan Chand Gurnani, Aged About 28
Years, R/o Ganj Road, Near Gulabdevi Dharamshala, Kishangarh
Bas, Alwar, Rajasthan.
                                                                     ----Petitioner
                                     Versus
1.       Dr.    Sarvepalli       Radhakrishnana           Rajasthan     Ayurvedic
         University, (Dr. S.r.a.u), University College Of Ayurved,
         Karwad, Jodhpur. Through Its Registrar
2.       Controller Of Examination, Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnana
         Rajasthan Ayurvedic University, University College Of
         Ayurved, Karwad, Jodhpur.
3.       The Mahatma Jyotiba Fule College Of Ayurveda, Nh 11,
         Sikar Road, Harota, Chomu, Jaipur (Raj.) Through Its
         Principal.
                                                                  ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)            :    Mr. Nitin Goklani
For Respondent(s)            :    Mr. Suniel Purohit
                                  Mr. Jasraj Singh Rajpurohit



               HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL BENIWAL

Order

10/10/2025

1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following

prayer:-

"A] By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the conduct and action of the respondents of not allowing the petitioner to undertake the examination of the remaining subject of this B.A.M.S. Third Professional year along with Fourt professional year Examination scheduled to commence from 04/06/2025 may kindly be declared as arbitrary and illegal and may kindly be set aside.

(Uploaded on 10/10/2025 at 05:45:26 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:44658] (2 of 3) [CW-11405/2025]

B] By any appropriate writ order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to allow and permit the petitioner to fill his examination from without any late fess and further be directed to permit the petitioner to undertake the examination for the B.A.M.S Third Professional Year along with Fourth professional year scheduled to commence from 04/06/2025 and further declare the results and issue the mark sheets. C] The cost of the litigation may be awarded in the favour of the humble petitioner.

D] Any other appropriate order that this hon'ble court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be also passed in favour of the petitioner."

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue

raised in the present writ petition was earlier considered by a Co-

ordinate Bench of this Court while deciding the S.B. Civil Writ

Petition No.11403/2025 (Jitendra Kumar Sharma vs. Dr.

Sarvepalli Radhakrishnana Rajasthan Ayurvedic University

& Ors.). The said writ petition was considered on merits and

dismissed vide order dated 18.09.2025 wherein it was held as

under:-

"6.Having perused the judgment passed by this Court in the case of Mohit Sharma (supra) and Regulations of 2022, this Court finds that Regulations of 2022 were issued in supersession to all existing orders and regulations. Thus, this Court finds that after coming into force the Regulation of 2022, a candidate who could not clear all three professional examinations of B.A.M.S. within a period of maximum ten years from the date of admission, could not have been allowed further attempts by the respondent-University to clear the due/remaining papers and therefore respondent- University has thus committed no illegality in debarring the petitioners from appearing in the examinations to clear the remaining papers of B.A.M.S. Course.

(Uploaded on 10/10/2025 at 05:45:26 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:44658] (3 of 3) [CW-11405/2025]

7.In view of aforesaid discussion, the present writ petitions are dismissed being bereft of merit."

3. In view of the submission made above, the present writ

petition is too dismissed in the same terms as Jitendra Kumar

Sharma (supra).

4. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.

(SUNIL BENIWAL),J 104-AbhishekK/-

(Uploaded on 10/10/2025 at 05:45:26 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter