Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bharat @ Bhartesh @ Dinesh vs State Of Rajasthan ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 15167 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 15167 Raj
Judgement Date : 11 November, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Bharat @ Bhartesh @ Dinesh vs State Of Rajasthan ... on 11 November, 2025

Author: Manoj Kumar Garg
Bench: Manoj Kumar Garg
[2025:RJ-JD:48368-DB]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
 D.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal)
                                  No. 271/2025

                                           IN

                    D.B. Criminal Appeal No.61/2025



(1) Bharat @ Bhartesh @ Dinesh S/o Kalulal, Aged About 30
Years
(2) Anil Rawal S/o Shankarlal Rawal, aged about 37 years,
(3) Bhimdas Vaishnav S/o Kilash Das Bairagi, aged about 33
years,
(4) Bherulal S/o Mohanlal Khatik, aged about 31 years,
(All are resident of Lasdawan, Police station Sadar Nimbahera,
Distt. Chittorgarh.
(At Present Lodged In Dist. Jail, Chittorgarh)
                                                                     ----Petitioners
                                       Versus
State Of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor
                                                                    ----Respondent



For Petitioner(s)            :     Mr. Zeeshan Ali
                                   with Mr. Aslam Khan
For Respondent(s)            :     Mr. C. S. Ojha, PP



          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA

Order

11/11/2025

Heard learned counsel for the parties on the application for

suspension of sentence.

The instant application for suspension of sentence has been

preferred by the appellants-applicants, who have been convicted

(Uploaded on 11/11/2025 at 04:32:01 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:48368-DB] (2 of 4) [SOSA-271/2025]

and sentenced by the learned Additional Sessions Judge Beghu,

District Chittorgarh, vide judgment dated 10.12.2024 in Sessions

Case No.26/2021. The appellants-applicants have been sentenced

as under:-

Offence U/s Sentence Fine Sentence in default of payment of fine 395 IPC Life Rs.50,000/- Three Years Imprisonment S.I. 368 IPC Five Years' S.I. Rs.2,000/- Two Years' S.I. 365 IPC Five Years' S.I. Rs.2,000/- Two Years' S.I. 120-B IPC Three Years S.I. Rs.1,000/- Three Months' S.I. 323 IPC One Years S.I. Rs.1,000/- Three Months' S.I. 342 IPC One Years S.I. Rs.1,000/- Three Months' S.I.

Learned counsel for the appellants-applicants submits that

the appellants were on bail during the trial and hearing of the

appeal will take sufficient long time. It is, thus, prayed that the

sentence awarded to the appellants-applicants by the trial court

may be suspended.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently

opposed the application for suspension of sentence.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties; after carefully

scrutinizing the record of the case and taking into consideration

that the appellant was on bail during the trial, this Court is

inclined to suspend the sentence awarded to the appellant-

applicant by the trial court vide judgment impugned.

Accordingly, this application for suspension of sentence filed

(Uploaded on 11/11/2025 at 04:32:01 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:48368-DB] (3 of 4) [SOSA-271/2025]

under Section 430 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the

substantive sentence passed by the learned Additional Sessions

Judge, Beghu, District Chittorgarh, in Sessions Case No.26/2021

against appellants-applicants namely (1) Bharat @ Bhartesh @

Dinesh S/o Kalulal, (2) Anil Rawal S/o Shankarlal Rawal,

(3) Bhimdas Vaishnav S/o Kilash Das Bairagi and (4)

Bherulal S/o Mohanlal Khatik, shall remain suspended till final

disposal of the aforesaid appeal provided they execute a personal

bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- each with two sureties of

Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for

their appearance in this Court on 15.12.2025 and whenever

ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions

indicated below:-

1. That they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the appellants changes the place of residence, they will give in writing his changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-appellants in a separate file. Such file be registered

as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the

accused-appellant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order

shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc.

file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating

to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the

said accused-appellants do not appear before the trial court, the

(Uploaded on 11/11/2025 at 04:32:01 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:48368-DB] (4 of 4) [SOSA-271/2025]

learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

cancellation of bail.

(SANGEETA SHARMA),J (MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J 34-Arun/-

(Uploaded on 11/11/2025 at 04:32:01 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter