Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Khemeshwar Joshi vs State Of Rajasthan
2025 Latest Caselaw 15148 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 15148 Raj
Judgement Date : 10 November, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Khemeshwar Joshi vs State Of Rajasthan on 10 November, 2025

     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
              S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 2568/2025

Khemeshwar Joshi S/o Prem Shankar Joshi, Aged About 51
Years, Resident Of Punali, Tehsil And District Dungarpur. The
Then Patwari, Patwar Mandal Parada Itivar, Tehsil Aaspur District
Dungarpur.
                                                                  ----Appellant
                                   Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
                                                                ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)         :     Mr. Jai Kishan Suthar
For Respondent(s)        :     Mr. Narendra Gehlot, PP
                               Mr. Omprakash Choudhary


              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHAH

Order

10/11/2025

IN S.B. Criminal Appeal (SB) No.2568/2025:-

1. Admit.

2. Call for the record.

IN S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application

No.2095/2025:-

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant-applicant as well as

learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on

record.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant-applicant submits that the

appellant-applicant has been convicted for the offences punishable

under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the

Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. He submits that there is an

allegation of demand and acceptance of a sum of Rs.25,000/-,

whereas the actual recovery effected is only Rs.10,000/-, at the

(Uploaded on 10/11/2025 at 07:25:11 PM)

(2 of 3) [CRLAS-2568/2025]

time when the appellant-applicant was posted as a Patwari. He

also submits that the appellant-applicant has been sentenced to

undergo one year's simple imprisonment, and there are bleak

chances of hearing of the appeal in near future. He, therefore,

implores this Court to allow the application for suspension of

sentence of the appellant-applicant.

3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the application

for suspension of sentence and submits that the learned Trial

Court has considered the entire evidence threadbare and has

passed a detailed order for convicting the appellant-applicant,

therefore, the application for suspension of sentence in question

deserves to be dismissed.

4. Having considered the arguments advanced by both the

sides and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the

case, including the facts that the appellant-applicant has been

sentenced to undergo one year's simple imprisonment, arguable

points have been raised by the learned counsel for the appellant,

and there are bleak chances of hearing of the appeal in near

future, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for

suspending the sentence awarded to the accused appellant-

applicant.

5. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed

under Section 430 of BNS is allowed and it is ordered that the

sentence passed by the learned Special Judge (Prevention of

Corruption Act), No.2, Udaipur, vide judgment dated 29.10.2025

in Special Sessions Case No.127/2019 (CIS No.522/2014), (State

of Rajasthan v. Khemeshwar Joshi), against the appellant-

applicant Khemeshwar Joshi S/o Prem Shankar Joshi, shall

(Uploaded on 10/11/2025 at 07:25:11 PM)

(3 of 3) [CRLAS-2568/2025]

remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and he

shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in

the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to

the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this

court on 11.12.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the

disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

6. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered

as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the

accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this

order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal

Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose

relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In

case the said accused applicant(s) does not appear before the trial

court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High

Court for cancellation of bail.

(SANDEEP SHAH),J 68-devrajP/-

(Uploaded on 10/11/2025 at 07:25:11 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter