Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ajit Kaur vs The State Of Rajasthan ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 14730 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 14730 Raj
Judgement Date : 1 November, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Ajit Kaur vs The State Of Rajasthan ... on 1 November, 2025

Author: Farjand Ali
Bench: Farjand Ali
[2025:RJ-JD:47028]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11166/2018

Ajit Kaur W/o Shri Harnek Singh, Aged About 50 Years, Vpo
Barwali, Tehsil Nohar District Hanumangarh.
                                                                         ----Petitioner
                                         Versus
1.       The    State     Of       Rajasthan,      Secretary,       Department      Of
         Medical       And         Health,     Government           Of     Rajasthan,
         Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.       Secretary,      Rural       Develoopment           And     Panchayati     Raj
         Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur
3.       Director, Medical And Health Service, Rajasthan, Jaipur
4.       Addl. Director (Admn.), Medical And Health Services,
         Rajasthan, Jaipur
5.       The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Hanumangarh.
6.       Smt. Sajjana Kumari, A.n.m. Posted At Sub Health
         Centre, Thirana, Tehsil Nohar District Hanumangarh.
                                                                    ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)              :     Mr. GR Bhari
For Respondent(s)              :     -



                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order

01/11/2025

1. The controversy involved in the present case is squarely

covered by the judgment passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this

Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11862/2017 (Samleta Vs.

State of Rajasthan & Ors.). The same is being reproduced

hereinbelow:-

"1. It is a case of inter district transfer. The petitioner was appointed as ANM. On 02.10.2010 by a notification issued by the State Government all Primary Health Centres and Community Health Centres in rural areas

(Uploaded on 04/11/2025 at 02:15:18 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:47028] (2 of 3) [CW-11166/2018]

including the staff was transferred from the Medical and Health Department of the State to the Panchyati Raj Institutions, requiring service to be governed by the Rajasthan Panchyati Raj (Transfer Activities) Rules, 2011. Pertaining to transfer, Rule 8 reads as under:

"8.Transfer:- Transfer of such transferred employees shall be made under the transfer policy and directions issued by the State Government from time to time, by:-

(i) the Administration and Establishment Committee of the Panchyat Samiti concerned within the same Panchayat Samiti.

(ii) the District Establishment Committee of the Zila Parishad concerned from one Panchayat Samiti to another Panchayat Samiti within the same District.

(iii) the department Concerned from one district to another district with the consent of the Panchayat Raj Department."

2. As per sub-rule (iii) whilst the department concerned i.e. the Medical and Health Department would be entitled to transfer ANMs from one district to the other, but since the employees become employees of Panchayati Raj Institutions, this has to be with the consent of the Panchayati Raj Department.

3. Concededly no such consent was taken. I note that vide order dated 20.9.2017 it was directed that joining of duties by the petitioner pursuant to impugned transfer order dated 15.9.2017 at the place where she has been transferred shall be subject to the decision of the writ petition.

4. The respondents have not been able to show to the Court as to why consent of the Panchayti Raj Department is not warranted.

5. The petition is disposed of quashing the transfer order dated15.9.2017 qua the petitioner."

(Uploaded on 04/11/2025 at 02:15:18 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:47028] (3 of 3) [CW-11166/2018]

2. Since the order passed without obtaining prior consent of the

Panchayati Raj Institution so also taking into account the fact that

the transfer order was passed seven years back, it is deemed

expedient in the interest of justice to allow the instant writ petition

making the interim order (dated 01.08.2018 passed by a co-

ordinate Bench of this Court) absolute.

3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is allowed.

4. The transfer order dated 12.07.2018 passed by the

respondent No.4 is hereby quashed and set aside qua the

petitioner.

5. Pending applications if any as well as stay petition stand

disposed of.

6. The respondent authority is not precluded from passing a

fresh order in accordance with law and the guiding judgment

referred supra.

(FARJAND ALI),J 3-divya/-

(Uploaded on 04/11/2025 at 02:15:18 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter