Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9929 Raj
Judgement Date : 20 May, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:24487]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1459/2025
1. Anjali Maliwal D/o Mukesh Maliwal, Aged About 24 Years,
Ward No.30, Maliwal Sweet, Sarafa Bazar, Bhilwara,
District Bhilwara, Rajasthan (Aadhar No. 6685 9525
0772)
2. Praveen Kabra S/o Ravindra Kabra, Aged About 32 Years,
A-26, Near Shiv Temple, Sanjay Colony, Bhilwara District
Bhilwara, Rajasthan. (Aadhar No. 4419 0744 3431)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Ministry Of
Home Affairs, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Director General Of Police, Govt. Of Rajasthan Police Head
Quarter, Jaipur.
3. The Superintendent Of Police, Bhilwara District Bhilwara
4. The S H O, Police Station, Sadar District Bhilwara
5. The S H O, Police Station, Subhash Nagar District
Bhilwara
6. Mukesh Maliwal S/o Mohan Maliwal, 2-F-4 , R. C. Vyas
Colony, Bhilwara, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan
7. Sunita Maliwal W/o Mukesh Maliwal, 2-F-4 , R. C. Vyas
Colony, Bhilwara, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan
8. Rajkumar Kabra S/o Jagdish Kabra, Station Road, Javad,
District Nimach, Madhya Pradesh.
9. Ravindra Kabra S/o Banshilal Kabra, Sector 14, House No.
561, Nehru Vihar, Bhilwara District Bhilwara, Rajasthan
10. Anita Kabra W/o Ravindra Kabra, Sector 14, House No.
561, Nehru Vihar, Bhilwara District Bhilwara, Rajasthan
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pritam Joshi
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sri Ram Choudhary, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
20/05/2025
[2025:RJ-JD:24487] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1459/2025]
The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the
petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking
direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.
The petitioners both being major persons claim to have
performed a love marriage. They submit that the marriage was
performed against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel
threat to their lives at the hands of private respondents, who are
their relatives. The petitioners allegedly approached the concerned
respondent authorities, with a prayer to be provided with
adequate protection but no heed has been paid to their request so
far.
The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and
the marriage ceremony performed between them have been filed
on record. Thus, taking cue from the judgment rendered by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the prayer made by the petitioners
for directing the concerned respondent authorities to provide
protection to the petitioners deserves to be accepted.
The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter
enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be
provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned
respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the
petitioners, who have performed a love marriage.
The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 248-divya/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!