Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ramchandra vs The State Of Rajasthan ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 8882 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8882 Raj
Judgement Date : 17 March, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Ramchandra vs The State Of Rajasthan ... on 17 March, 2025

Author: Dinesh Mehta
Bench: Dinesh Mehta

[2025:RJ-JD:14026]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 38/2025

Ramchandra S/o Asha Ram, Aged About 49 Years, Keriya Rawan, P/o Siresana, District Nagaur.

----Petitioner Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. Director, Secondary Education Department, Rajasthan, Bikaner.

3. District Education Officer (Hq), Secondary Education Department, District Nagaur.

                                                                       ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)               :     Mr. Kamal Kishore Bissa
For Respondent(s)               :     Mr. N.K. Mehta



                           JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

                                           Order

17/03/2025

1. The present writ petition has been preferred for the following

reliefs:-

"(i) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may be directed to provide annual grade increments to the petitioner in terms of the statutory provisions and circulars on notional basis counting his services from 31.05.2004 and actual benefits from February, 2017.

(ii) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, respondents may also be directed to count the services of the petitioner from 2004 for the purpose of A.C.P. and release all benefits in the form of arrears alongwith 18% interest rate.

[2025:RJ-JD:14026] (2 of 3) [CW-38/2025]

(iii) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may be directed to pay all the services benefits of the petitioner."

2. Mr. Bissa, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that

the issue involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered

by the judgment dated 04.04.2019 passed by this Court in a

bunch of writ petitions led by S.B. Civil Writ Petition

No.10333/2017 : Mohhamad Umer Rangrej Vs. State of

Rajasthan & Ors.

3. Inviting Court's attention towards the judgment dated

04.04.2019 passed in the case of Mohhamad Umer Rangrej

(supra) and the circular dated 02.06.2020, Mr. Bissa, learned

counsel for the petitioner contended that petitioner's services is

required to be taken notionally from the date of his appointment

order i.e. 31.05.2004 and is entitled for actual monetary benefits

when he has submitted certificate of RS-CIT course in the month

of February, 2017.

4. Mr. Mehta, learned counsel for the respondent - State

submits that simply because the order of appointment does not

contain a condition for clearing the typing test, the petitioner

cannot avoid the condition mentioned in the Rajasthan

Compassionate Appointment of Dependents of Deceased

Government Servants Rules, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as

'Rules of 1996') which in no ambiguous terms provides that a

candidate has to acquire the eligibility and educational

qualification as required for the post he is appointed.

5. Learned counsel argued that since the petitioner had

acquired RS-CIT certificate in the month of February, 2017, he is

[2025:RJ-JD:14026] (3 of 3) [CW-38/2025]

entitled to all the benefits, including the benefits of annual grade

increments.

6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the

record.

7. According to this Court, simply because the appointment

order does not contain a condition of clearing typing test which

was the qualification prevailing when the petitioner was given

appointment under the Rules of 1996, the petitioner cannot claim

immunity from fulfilling such requirement - he has to acquire the

basic qualification and Typing proficiency which is sine-qua-non for

the appointment. But at the same time, since he had acquired the

RS-CIT certificate in the month of February, 2017, he cannot be

denied the benefit under condition No.6 of the circular dated

02.06.2020, which provides that an employee appointed under the

Rules of 1996 shall be given notional increments until he clears

typing test or acquires RS-CIT certificate.

8. The present writ petition is, therefore, allowed as per clause

No.(i) of the prayer.

9. The respondents are directed to consider petitioner's

appointment notionally from the date of his initial appointment i.e.

31.05.2004 and grant him the annual grade increments notionally

up to February, 2017, whereafter he shall be entitled to actual

benefits of increments in terms of the circular dated 02.06.2020

and other relevant circulars from time to time.

10. The stay application also stands disposed of, accordingly.

(DINESH MEHTA),J 6-akansha/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter