Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Norang Singh vs Rajasthan State Road Transport ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 1663 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1663 Raj
Judgement Date : 2 July, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Norang Singh vs Rajasthan State Road Transport ... on 2 July, 2025

Author: Vinit Kumar Mathur
Bench: Vinit Kumar Mathur
[2025:RJ-JD:28351]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                  S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12416/2025

1.       Norang Singh S/o Shri Inder Singh, Aged About 63 Years,
         Resident Of Godras Koliya, Deedwana, District Nagaur
         (Rajasthan).
2.       Bheru Singh S/o Shri Ummed Singh, Aged About 66
         Years,      Resident        Of    Village     Koliya,       District    Nagaur
         (Rajasthan).
                                                                        ----Petitioners
                                          Versus
1.       Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Chomu
         House, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur Through Its Chairman And
         Managing Director.
2.       The Executive Director (Administration), Rajasthan State
         Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur.
3.       The Chief Depot Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport
         Corporation,          Deedwana            Depot,           District     Nagaur
         (Rajasthan).
                                                                     ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)              :     Mr. Inderjeet Yadav



         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Order

02/07/2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by a

judgment of this Court rendered in S.B. Civil Writ Petition

No.8810/2014 (Tara Chand Vs. Rajasthan State Road

Transport Corporation & Anr.) decided on 25.01.2017 in the

following terms:-

[2025:RJ-JD:28351] (2 of 3) [CW-12416/2025]

"Apparently, by effect of the above circular, benefit of second selection scale falling due to the petitioner could only have been deferred by two years and not more. In this background, the decision of the respondent Corporation to defer second selection scale admissible to the petitioner from 6.10.2008 to 6.10.2019 is totally unjustified, arbitrary and contrary to the circulars adopted by the Corporation.

The impugned action of the respondents is thus quashed and struck down. The respondents shall extend the benefit of second selection scale to the petitioner by making a deferment of two years from the date of his actual entitlement. Monetary benefits flowing from the above direction shall be paid to the petitioner within a period of six months from today with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of accrual till the date of actual payment. In case, the payment is delayed beyond three months, the interest shall stand enhanced to 9% per annum and shall be recoverable from the official/s responsible for causing the delay if any."

3. Learned counsel further submits that the order dated

25.01.2017 was affirmed by the Division Bench in D.B. Civil

Special Appeal (Writ) No.524/2018 decided on 02.12.2021.

Against the order dated 02.12.2021 passed by the Division Bench

of this Court, a Special Leave Petition No.10330/2022 was

preferred before Hon'ble The Supreme Court and the same was

also dismissed vide judgment dated 13.07.2022.

4. In this view of the matter, the learned counsel for the

petitioners submits that the petitioners may be permitted to file a

representation before the respondents, who shall consider the

same in light of the judgment rendered by this Court in the case

of Tara Chand (supra).

5. In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for

the petitioners, the present writ petition is disposed of with a

[2025:RJ-JD:28351] (3 of 3) [CW-12416/2025]

direction that in the event of filing a representation by the

petitioners, the respondent shall decide the same within a period

of four weeks from the date of its receipt, keeping in mind the law

laid down by this Court in the case of Tara Chand (supra).

6. The order has been passed based on the submissions made

in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the

veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case,

the averments made therein are found to be correct, the

petitioners would be entitled to the relief.

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

267-Payal/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter