Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3661 Raj
Judgement Date : 2 January, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:88]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 21251/2024
1. Dasharath Kanwar Chundawat D/o Prem Singh
Chundawat, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Rawala Guda
Sursinghji, Pali Rajasthan, Presently Posted At Gsss
Phulad, District Pali.
2. Bhavna Khatik D/o Pyar Chand, Aged About 33 Years, R/o
Khatik Mohalla Kothariya Chak-A Nathdwara, District
Rajsamand, Presently Posted At Gsss Manda, District Pali.
3. Poonam Sharma D/o Somdutt Sharma, Aged About 41
Years, R/o Ward No. 15 Tibbi Dist. Hanumangarh,
Rajasthan, Presently Posted At Shri Hari Singh Gsss
Ridmalsar Bapini, District Jodhpur.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
2. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner, District
Bikaner, Rajasthan.
3. The Joint Director, Secondary Education, Pali, District Pali,
Rajasthan.
4. The Joint Director, Secondary Education, Jodhpur, District
Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanwar Singh Rathore.
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA
Order(Oral)
02/01/2025
1. Petitioners herein are before this Court seeking directions to
the respondents to give the service benefits, seniority and notional
benefit as was given to the candidates, who were selected /
appointed for the post of Teacher Grade-II pursuant to the
advertisement dated 13.07.2016.
2. At the outset, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the
petitioners that the issue raised in the present writ petition is
[2025:RJ-JD:88] (2 of 2) [CW-21251/2024]
covered an order dated 16.07.2014 passed by the Jaipur Bench of
this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7283/2014 : Manoj
Khandelwal & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. He submits
that the petitioners are sanguine that, in case they are allowed to
file a representation qua the grievance raised in the present writ
petition and the same is considered in light of the aforesaid
judgment, they will be meted out with favorable treatment.
3. In view of the aforesaid, without commenting on the merits
of the case, the petition filed by the petitioners is disposed of with
a direction to the competent authority to decide the
representation (may file fresh, if not already filed) of the
petitioners, in accordance with law, keeping in view the
observations made in the case of Manoj Khandelwal (supra), as
expeditiously as possible.
4. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(ARUN MONGA),J 4-/Jitender/Rmathur/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!