Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sudam Khan vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:53576)
2025 Latest Caselaw 16546 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 16546 Raj
Judgement Date : 10 December, 2025

[Cites 3, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Sudam Khan vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:53576) on 10 December, 2025

[2025:RJ-JD:53576]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                         JODHPUR
            S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1660/2025

Sudam Khan S/o Najar Khan, Aged About 31 Years, Aman
Enclave, Chak 3A, Choti, Sadbhawna Nagar, Sri Ganganagar
                                                                     ----Petitioner
                                     Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2.       Gurcharan Singh S/o Shri Mithu Singh, Chak 3 A Choti,
         Sadbhawna Nagar, Sri Ganganagar
                                                                  ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Himmat Jagga.
For Respondent(s)          :     Mr. Surendra Bishnoi, PP.
                                 Mr. Rahul Bishnoi for Mr. Shardul
                                 Singh Bishnoi.



          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT

Order

10/12/2025 This revision petition has been filed against the judgment

dated 19.11.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge, Scheduled

Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities Cases),

Shriganganagar in Criminal Appeal No.11/2021 by which, the

appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed and the judgment

dated 22.09.2021 passed by the learned Special Judicial

Magistrate (NI Act Cases) No.1, Srigangangar, in Criminal Regular

Case No.17/2017 (CIS No.378/2017) convicting and sentencing

the petitioner for offence under Section 138 N.I. Act has been

affirmed. The petitioner was sentenced to undergo six months'

simple imprisonment along with fine in the sum of Rs.1,10,000/-.

(Uploaded on 11/12/2025 at 01:37:35 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:53576] (2 of 3) [CRLR-1660/2025]

In default of payment of fine, the petitioner was sentenced to

undergo 30 days' simple imprisonment.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

and complainant-respondent No.2 have entered into a compromise

and the respondent No.2 has received the whole amount from the

petitioner and does not want to proceed with the matter, therefore

the sentence of imprisonment awarded to the petitioner may be

set aside.

Learned counsel for respondent No.2 concurs with the facts

stated by the counsel for the petitioner.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer made by

learned counsel for the petitioner and prayed for dismissal of the

instant criminal revision petition, however, he does not dispute the

fact that a compromise has been arrived at between the parties.

I have heard the arguments advanced by counsel for the

parties and perused the compromise deed.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case,

since the parties have settled their dispute and complainant-

respondent No.2 has accepted the sum towards full and final

settlement of dispute on the satisfaction of the complainant and in

the light of provisions of Section 147 of NI Act and in view of law

laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjabij Tari

v. Kishore S. Borcar & Anr. (2025 INSC 1158), the sentence

awarded to the petitioner for offence under Section 138 NI Act is

liable to be set aside. However, since the compromise has been

arrived at after rejection of the appeal preferred by the petitioner,

(Uploaded on 11/12/2025 at 01:37:35 PM)

[2025:RJ-JD:53576] (3 of 3) [CRLR-1660/2025]

a cost of 7.5% of the cheque amount deserves to be imposed

upon the petitioner in light of the decision rendered by the Hon'ble

Apex Court in the case of Sanjabij Tari (supra).

Accordingly, the conviction and sentence of imprisonment

awarded to the petitioner for offence under Section 138 NI Act

vide judgments dated 19.11.2025 and 22.09.2021 are hereby set

aside on the basis of the aforesaid compromise subject to

deposition of cost of 7.5% of the cheque amount. The cost shall

be deposited by the petitioner before the Rajasthan State Legal

Services Authority, Jodhpur within a period of one month from

today. In case, the cost is not deposited by the petitioner before

the Rajasthan State Legal Services Authority, Jodhpur within the

stipulated period, the revision petition may be listed before this

Court for passing appropriate orders.

The revision petition is allowed in the above terms.

A copy of this order be sent to the Rajasthan State Legal

Services Authority, Jodhpur.

(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J 84-/Jitender//-

(Uploaded on 11/12/2025 at 01:37:35 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter