Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 9701 Raj
Judgement Date : 20 August, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:37209]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 4130/2025
1. Sanjay Jatav S/o Rajesh Jatav, Aged About 30 Years, R/o
Ramdev Mandir Ke Pass, Paldi Road, Subhash Nagar,
Bhilwara.
2. Rakesh Yadav S/o Bhim Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o
Ramdev Mandir Ke Pass, Paldi Road, Subhash Nagar,
Bhilwara.
3. Mukesh Yadav S/o Ram Singh Yadav, Aged About 39
Years, R/o Ramdev Mandir Ke Pass, Paldi Road, Subhash
Nagar, Bhilwara.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2. Dimple Yadav S/o Harsh Yadav, R/o Ram Vihar, Subhash
Nagar, District Bhilwara.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bharat Gurjar
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Singh, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT
Order
20/08/2025
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not want to press
the instant criminal misc. petition. However, he seeks liberty for
the petitioners to submit a representation to the concerned
Superintendent of Police with appropriate directions to decide the
same and issue necessary instructions to the concerned
Investigating Officer.
2. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition as well as stay
petition are dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the petitioners
to submit a detailed representation to the concerned
Superintendent of Police averring therein all the grounds which
have been raised in this petition within a period of 07 days from
the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
[2025:RJ-JD:37209] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4130/2025]
3. In the event, the representation is submitted, the concerned
Superintendent of Police is directed to minutely and objectively
consider the contents of the same and thereafter, issue necessary
instructions to the Investigating Officer. All the relevant
documents with the representation shall also be taken into
consideration. The representation shall be decided within a period
of 30 days from the date of receipt of the same. Till the
representation is decided, the petitioners shall not be arrested in
connection with FIR No.20/2025 registered at the Police Station
Subhash Nagar, District Bhilwara.
4. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Sections
189(2), 126(2), 115(2) and 110 of BNS. Thus, the provisions
contained under Section 35 of BNSS (Sections 41 and 41A of the
CrPC) are applicable mutatis mutandis and the judgment rendered
by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar v. State
of Bihar [AIR 2014 SC 2756] applies squarely in the present
case, therefore, it is deemed appropriate to direct the
investigating officer that in the event, the offences are found to be
proved and the arrest of the petitioners is absolutely necessary,
then instead of affecting arrest at once, a prior notice of 15 days
shall be given to the petitioners. Further the petitioners shall be at
liberty to approach this Court, if occasion arises.
5. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J 48-mSingh/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!