Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Swati Paliwal vs State Of Rajasthan (2025:Rj-Jd:38457) on 28 August, 2025
Author: Nupur Bhati
Bench: Nupur Bhati
[2025:RJ-JD:38457]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16091/2025
1. Swati Paliwal D/o Vishnu Paliwal, Aged About 32 Years, R/
o Purohit Bhawan, Dhariawad, District Pratapgarh.
2. Manju Kumari D/o Ramkishan W/o Praveen Kumar, Aged
About 33 Years, R/o Netrampura, Jakhod, District
Jhunjhunu.
3. Subhita Kumari D/o Radmal Singh, Aged About 39 Years,
R/o Village Birol, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu.
4. Ramesh Kumar Gameti S/o Kishan Lal Gameti, Aged
About 38 Years, R/o Village Nichli Odan, Post Upali Odan,
Tehsil Nathdwara, District Rajsamand.
5. Mohabbat Singh Chawda S/o Goverdhan Singh Chawda,
Aged About 41 Years, R/o Sarvwaishwar Colony, Mali
Colony Road, Behind Prabhat Material, Tekri, Udaipur.
6. Krishna Sharma D/o Jagannath Prasad Sharma W/o
Rajendra Kumar Sharma, Aged About 50 Years, R/o 63-B,
Hanuman Nagar, Sirsi Road, Bhankrota, Tehsil Sanganer,
District Jaipur.
7. Loger Lal Meena S/o Dhanna Meena, Aged About 45
Years, R/o Umariya, Gudali, Bambora, Tehsil Kurabad,
District Udaipur.
8. Puran Singh Ranawat S/o Rai Singh Ranawat, Aged About
43 Years, R/o Vpo Basni Kalan, Via Fatehnagar, District
Udaipur.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary,
Department Of Rural Development And Panchayati Raj
(Panchayati Raj), Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
2. Additional Commissioner, Rural Development And
Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan,
Jaipur.
3. District Programme Coordinator And District Collector,
Pratapgarh, Rajasthan.
4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Pratapgarh,
Rajasthan.
(Downloaded on 28/08/2025 at 09:53:43 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:38457] (2 of 3) [CW-16091/2025]
5. Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Dhariawad,
District Pratapgarh, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pawan Singh
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI
Order
28/08/2025
1. Petition herein arises, inter alia, out of the inaction on the
part of the respondents in not according the correct service and
notional benefits to the petitioners.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners at the outset submits that
qua the aforesaid grievance, the petitioners may be granted
liberty to file a fresh representation before the competent
authority and the same be decided by passing appropriate
administrative orders, in accordance with law.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners also relies on
order/judgment in Nand Kishore Sharma & Ors. v. The State
of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition
No.12109/2018, decided on 18.07.2018 at Jaipur Bench and
submits that the respondents may be directed to consider the
representation of the petitioners in light of the aforesaid
judgment.
4. Request seems to be fair.
5. Given the nature of order which is being passed, no
prejudice would be caused to the respondents and, therefore, the
requirement of issuance of notice is dispensed with as no return is
required to be filed by them.
[2025:RJ-JD:38457] (3 of 3) [CW-16091/2025]
6. In the aforesaid premise, the writ petition is disposed of with
a liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh representation, which
shall be gone into by the competent authority and appropriate
administrative order shall be passed in accordance with law.
7. Needless to say that the competent authority shall go
through the judgment relied upon by learned counsel for the
petitioners as mentioned hereinabove and apply its independent
mind on the applicability of the same before passing any order.
8. Needful be done as expeditiously as possible.
(DR. NUPUR BHATI),J
surabhii/63-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
