Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mohani vs State Of Rajasthan6 ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 11916 Raj

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 11916 Raj
Judgement Date : 17 April, 2025

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Mohani vs State Of Rajasthan6 ... on 17 April, 2025

Author: Kuldeep Mathur
Bench: Kuldeep Mathur
[2025:RJ-JD:18914]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
               S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1029/2025

1.       Mohani D/o Mala Ram, Aged About 27 Years, Resdient Of
         Tulchhaniya Ki Dhani Gav Veer Teja Nagar Bana Ka Bas
         Police Station Osiian Jodhpur At Present Prahaladpura
         Chamu Jodhpur Rajasthan
2.       Rewat Ram S/o Hukma Ram, Aged About 32 Years,
         Prahaladpura Chamu Jodhpur Rajasthan
                                                                         ----Petitioners
                                         Versus
1.       State       Of      Rajasthan6,           Through            Chief   Secretary
         Department Of Home Affairs Jaipur
2.       Superintendent Of Police, Jodhpur Rural
3.       Station     House         Officer,     Police     Station       Osian   District
         Jodhpur
4.       Malaram S/o Rupa Ram, Ro Tulchhaniya Ki Dhani Gav
         Veer Teja Nagar Bana Ka Bas Police Station Osian Jodhpur
5.       Bega Ram S/o Mala Ram, Ro Tulchhaniya Ki Dhani Gav
         Veer Teja Nagar Bana Ka Bas Police Station Osian Jodhpur
6.       Kishan S/o Hema Ram, R/o Bana Ka Bas Cherai Osian
         Jodhpur
                                                                       ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)              :     Mr. Rakesh Gupta
For Respondent(s)              :     Mr. Narendra Gehlot, PP



            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Order

17/04/2025 The criminal writ petition has been preferred by the

petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking

direction for being provided with adequate security and protection.

The petitioners both being major persons claim to have

performed a love marriage. They submit that the marriage was

[2025:RJ-JD:18914] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1029/2025]

performed against the wishes of their parents and thus, they feel

threat to their lives at the hands of private respondents, who are

their relatives. The petitioners allegedly approached the concerned

respondent authorities, with a prayer to be provided with

adequate protection but no heed has been paid to their request so

far.

The documents pertaining to the age of the petitioners and

the marriage ceremony performed between them have been filed

on record. Thus, taking cue from the judgment rendered by the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P.

Reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, the prayer made by the petitioners

for directing the concerned respondent authorities to provide

protection to the petitioners deserves to be accepted.

The concerned respondent authorities shall have the matter

enquired into and if so required, appropriate protection shall be

provided to the petitioners as and when warranted. The concerned

respondent authorities shall ensure that no harm is caused to the

petitioners, who have performed a love marriage.

The criminal writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 245-himanshu/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter