Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 11237 Raj
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:18087]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6555/2020
Management Committee Swami Keshwanand College
Gramothan Vidhyapeeth Sangaria, District Hanumangarh,
Rajasthan Through Its Secretary Sukhraj Singh S/o Shri Jeevan
Singh, Aged About 55 Years.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Smt. Sunita Grover D/o Shri Hardari Lal Grover, Resident
Of Ward No. 13, Upasana Niketan, Jublee Ramlila
Ground, Sangaria, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
2. Commissioner, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5069/2020
Management Committee Swami Keshwanand College
Gramothan Vidhyapeeth Sangaria, District Hanumangarh,
Rajasthan Through Its Secretary Sukhraj Singh S/o Shri Jeevan
Singh, Aged About 55 Years.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Pancham S/o Shri Hulasi, Resident Of Ward No. 24,
Sangaria, Tehsil Sangaria, District Hanumangarh,
Rajasthan.
2. The Director/ommissioner, Agricultural Department, Pant
Agriculture Building, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8311/2022
Management Committee Gramotthan Vidhyapeeth Swami
Keshwanand College, Sangaria District Hanumangarh,
Rajasthan Through Its Secretary Sukhraj Singh S/o Jeevan
Singh, Aged About 58 Years.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Vidyadevi W/o Raghuveer Singh
2. Anita D/o Raghuveer Singh,
(Downloaded on 08/04/2025 at 10:46:55 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:18087] (2 of 6) [CW-6555/2020]
3. Sarita D/o Raghuveer Singh,
4. Deepak S/o Raghuveer Singh, All Four Resides At Ward
No. 23 Sangaria District Hanumangarh.
5. Sunita D/o Raghuveer Singh, R/o Chaube Ka Purba Teh.
Bikapur Dist Faizabad (Up).
6. Mithilesh D/o Raghuveer, R/o Raipurwa Tehsil Dhamolia
(U.p.).
7. Secretary, Dept Of Higher Education Govt. Of Rajasthan,
Secretariat, Jaipur.
8. Director, College Education Directorate Dept Of College
Education Block 4 Dr. S. Radhakrishan Shiksha Sankul,
Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Govt Of Raj, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
9. Director, Dept Of Agriculture, Administration, Pant Krishi
Bhawan, C-Scheme, Jaipur Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8318/2022
Management Committee Gramotthan Vidhyapeeth Swami
Keshwanand College Sangaria District Hanumangarh, Through
The Secretary Sukhraj Singh S/o Jeevan Singh Aged About 58
Years
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Moolchand Jain S/o Jesraj Marothi, R/o Ward No.17 Teh.
Sangaria Dist Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
2. Director, College Education Directorate Dept Of College
Education Block No 4 Dr. S. Radhakrishnan Shiksha
Sankul, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Govt. Of Raj. Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
3. Secretary, Dept Of Agriculture, Administration, Pant
Krishi Bhawan, C-Scheme, Jaipur Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8409/2022
Management Committee Gramotthan Vidhyapeeth Swami
Keshwanand College Sangaria, District Hanumangarh,
Rajasthan Through Its Secretary Sukhraj Singh S/o Jeevan
Singh Aged About 58 Years.
----Petitioner
(Downloaded on 08/04/2025 at 10:46:55 PM)
[2025:RJ-JD:18087] (3 of 6) [CW-6555/2020]
Versus
1. Narender Singh Bhanbu S/o Mohan Lal Bhanbu, R/o
Ward No. 15, Sangaria, Dist. Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
2. Director, College Education Directorate Dept Of College
Education Block No. 4 Dr. S. Radhakrishan Shiksha
Sankul, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Govt Of Raj. Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
3. Director, Dept. Of Agriculture, Administration, Pant Krishi
Bhawan, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nishant Motsara &
Mr. Hamir Singh Sidhu
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Deepak Pareek
Mr. Jitendra Singh Bhaleria
Mr. Sajjan Singh Rajpurohit
Mr. M.S. Bishnoi
Mr. Subhash Choudhary
Mr. Sukh Ram Bishnoi
Mr. Hanuman Ram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order 08/04/2025
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
controversy involved in this matter is identical to one decided by
this Court in a bunch of writ petitions led by Marudhar Balika
Vidyapeeth Vidyawadi Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil
Writ Petition No.6082/2020 decided on 26.04.2023 and prays
that similar directions be issued in the present case.
2. Learned counsel for the respondents do not dispute the
aforesaid position and prayer.
3. Hence, the present writ petitions are also disposed of in terms
of the judgment in the case of Marudhar Balika Vidyapeeth
Vidyawadi (supra) rendered on 26.04.2023.
[2025:RJ-JD:18087] (4 of 6) [CW-6555/2020]
4. The directions given by this Court in Marudhar Balika
Vidyapeeth Vidyawadi (supra) shall also apply in the present case
and for the sake of clarity the same are being reproduced
hereunder [with modification of date in para (xi)]:-
"(i) The petitioners (Institutions) shall send due
drawn statements of the employee(s) to the
competent authority of the State Government within
a period of 15 days from today (if not already
sent).
(ii) If the due drawn statements of the employees
have already been sent, the Institutions shall forward
a photocopy of the due drawn statement and order of
the Tribunal to the respective District Education
Officer (D.E.O.) within a period of 15 days from
today along with a copy of the order instant.
(iii) The respective District Education
Officer/competent authority of the State Government
shall examine and process the same and determine
the amount payable to each of the employees within
a period of three months from today.
(iv) On determination/calculation of the amount
aforesaid, the State Government/competent
authority shall send a copy thereof to the Tribunal
giving reference of the Case No. and date of decision
etc. The State shall also forward a copy to the
Educational Institution(s), where the employee(s)
had served.
[2025:RJ-JD:18087] (5 of 6) [CW-6555/2020]
(v) On receipt of the calculation made by the State
Government, the petitioner - Institutions will be
required to deposit their share of the amount (10%,
20% or 30%, as the case may be) with the Tribunal
within a period of one month from the date of receipt
of the calculation sent by the State Government. It
will be required of the Institution(s) to inform the
employee(s) about the amount being deposited and
the calculation of the amount made by the State.
(vi) On receipt of the information about payment
being deposited by the Institution(s), the
employee(s) concerned will furnish the details of
their bank account before the Tribunal.
(vii) The State Government shall deposit its share
(90%, 80% and 70%, as the case may be) before
the Tribunal within a period of six months of the
amount having been determined.
(viii) The amount deposited by the Institutions and
the State Government will be remitted in the
accounts of the employees forthwith.
(ix) Upon the full amount as calculated by the State
being deposited by the State and the Institutions, the
execution proceedings before the Tribunal/Civil Court
shall stand closed.
(x) Since the Tribunal has neither determined the
amount nor was any dispute about the amount
before the Tribunal raised, each employee shall be
free to take up his/her cause afresh before the
[2025:RJ-JD:18087] (6 of 6) [CW-6555/2020]
Tribunal, in case they are not satisfied with the
amount calculated by the State Government.
(xi) Till 30.09.2025, the execution proceedings (if
any) pending before the Tribunal or in the concerned
Civil Courts shall remain in abeyance."
5. All interlocutory application(s) including stay petition(s) stand
disposed of accordingly.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 228-232-SanjayS/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!