Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 6231 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 24 October, 2024
[2024:RJ-JP:44699-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16669/2024
Dr. Surendra Kumar Mittal S/o Bhagwati Prasad Mittal, Aged
About 60 Years, R/o Near Gopal Temple, Masuda, P.o. Masuda
District, Ajmer. 305263.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary,
Department Of Ayurveda (Ayush) Government Of
Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary,
Department Of Ayurveda And Bhartiya Chikitsa (Ayush),
Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat,
Jaipur.
3. Dy. Secretary, Department Of Ayurveda And Bhartiya
Chikitsa (Ayush), Government Of Rajasthan, Government
Secretariat, Jaipur.
4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary,
Department Of Personnel, Government Secretariat,
Jaipur.
5. Director Ayurveda, Directorate Of Ayurveda, Ajmer.
----Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Rishabh Khandelwal, Advocate
For Respondents : None
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Order
24/10/2024
1. After the order was passed by this Court in another petition
earlier on 20.09.2024, new developments have been brought to
the notice of this Court, one of them regarding dismissal of the
Review Petition by the Hon'ble Supreme Court filed in the case of
(Downloaded on 27/10/2024 at 12:34:02 AM)
[2024:RJ-JP:44699-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-16669/2024]
State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Dr. Mahesh Chandra Sharma
on 15.10.2024 as stated at the bar by learned counsel for the
petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also placed before this
Court order dated 27.09.2024 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in the case of The State of Rajashtan & Ors. Vs. Pyare
Lal Meena & Ors. (Special Leave to Appeal (C)
No.10560/2024), wherein, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has
clarified that there is no stay on the judgment of the High Court
and further that in the event the outstanding towards salary has
not been paid, the same shall be cleared within a period of one
week. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that
the petitioner will retire from service on 31.10.2024.
3. In view of the above developments, we need not keep this
petition pending and same is also finally disposed off in terms of
order passed earlier by this Court in the case of Dr. Mahesh
Chandra Sharma & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. and
other connected matters (D.B. Civil Writ Petition
No.13496/2021), decided on 13.07.2022. The petitioner will be
entitled to the same relief as was granted in the aforesaid cases
meaning thereby, the petitioner is entitled to continue in service
with all consequential benefits including monetary benefits upto
the age of 62 years.
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ
Manoj Narwani-RAHUL/3
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!