Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Icici Lombard Gen. Insu. Co. Ltd., And ... vs Harikishan Arora (2024:Rj-Jd:10508)
2024 Latest Caselaw 2109 Raj

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 2109 Raj
Judgement Date : 1 March, 2024

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Icici Lombard Gen. Insu. Co. Ltd., And ... vs Harikishan Arora (2024:Rj-Jd:10508) on 1 March, 2024

Author: Nupur Bhati

Bench: Nupur Bhati

[2024:RJ-JD:10508]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10720/2016

1.     ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd., 15, National
       Highway, Shriganganagar.
2.     ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd., ICICI Bank
       Towers, Bandra-kurla complex, Mumbai-4000051.
       Both petitioners through Authorized signatory at Bhagwati
       Bhawan, Above PL Motors, Near Govt. Hostel Crossing, MI
       Road, Jaipur.
                                                                      ----Petitioner
                                      Versus
Harikishan Arora S/o Sh. Bhagwan Das, R/o 75, Patel Nagar,
Purani Asbadi, Shriganganagar.
                                                                   ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)           :     Mr. Santosh Choudhary
For Respondent(s)           :     Mr. I.R. Choudhary



               HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE NUPUR BHATI

Order

01/03/2024

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the

controversy involved in this petition is squarely covered by the

judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of

Mukund Dewangan Vs. Oriental Insurance Company

Limited reported in 2017 AIR(SC) 3668, decided on

03.07.2017. The Relevant portion of the said judgment is

reproduced hereunder:-

"xxxx Thus, we answer the questions which are referred to us thus:

(i) 'Light motor vehicle' as defined in section 2(21) of the Act would include a transport vehicle as per the weight prescribed in section 2(21) read with section 2(15) and 2(48). Such transport vehicles are

[2024:RJ-JD:10508] (2 of 3) [CW-10720/2016]

not excluded from the definition of the light motor vehicle by virtue of Amendment Act No.54/1994.

(ii) A transport vehicle and omnibus, the gross vehicle weight of either of which does not exceed 7500 kg. would be a light motor vehicle and also motor car or tractor or a road roller, 'unladen weight' of which does not exceed 7500 kg. and holder of a driving licence to drive class of "light motor vehicle"

as provided in section 10(2)(d) is competent to drive a transport vehicle or omnibus, the gross vehicle weight of which does not exceed 7500kg. or a motor car or tractor or road-roller, the "unladen weight" of which does not exceed 7500 kg. That is to say, no separate endorsement on the licence is required to drive a transport vehicle of light motor vehicle class as enumerated above. A licence issued under section 10(2)(d) continues to be valid after Amendment Act 54/1994 and 28.3.2001 in the form.

(iii) The effect of the amendment made by virtue of Act No.54/1994 w.e.f. 14.11.1994 while substituting clauses (e) to (h) of section 10(2) which contained "medium goods vehicle" in section 10(2)(e), medium passenger motor vehicle in section 10(2)(f), heavy goods vehicle in section 10(2)(g) and"heavy passenger motor vehicle" in section 10(2)(h) with expression 'transport vehicle' as substituted in section 10(2)(e) related only to the aforesaid substituted classes only. It does not exclude transport vehicle, from the purview of section 10(2)

(d) and section 2(41) of the Act i.e. light motor vehicle.

(iv) The effect of amendment of Form 4 by insertion of "transport vehicle" is related only to the categories which were substituted in the year 1994 and the procedure to obtain driving licence for transport vehicle of class of "light motor vehicle"

continues to be the same as it was and has not been changed and there is no requirement to obtain separate endorsement to drive transport vehicle, and if a driver is holding licence to drive light motor vehicle, he can drive transport vehicle of such class without any endorsement to that effect.

xxxxx."

Learned counsel for the petitioner is not in a position to

refute the same.

[2024:RJ-JD:10508] (3 of 3) [CW-10720/2016]

Thus, in view of the submissions made and applying ratio of

the judgment in the case of Mukund Dewangan Vs. Oriental

Insurance Company Limited (supra), the instant writ petition

is also dismissed in same terms.

Stay application as well as all other pending applications, if

any, also stand dismissed.

(DR. NUPUR BHATI),J

186-/Devesh/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter