Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Parbhu Dayal Saini Son Of Shri Bhagwan ... vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:10381)
2024 Latest Caselaw 1426 Raj/2

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1426 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 29 February, 2024

Rajasthan High Court

Parbhu Dayal Saini Son Of Shri Bhagwan ... vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:10381) on 29 February, 2024

Author: Ganesh Ram Meena

Bench: Ganesh Ram Meena

[2024:RJ-JP:10381]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

                 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20568/2023

Parbhu Dayal Saini Son Of Shri Bhagwan Sahai Saini, Aged
About 70 Years, Resident Of Police Ka Mohalla, Chhawani, Neem
Ka Thana, District Sikar (Raj.)
                                                                              ----Petitioner
                                         Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary,
         Department Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan,
         Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
2.       Principal Secretary, Department Of Finance, Govt. Of
         Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.).
3.       Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner (Raj.)
4.       Dy. Director, Elementary Education Department, Jaipur
         Division Jaipur (Raj.)
5.       The Director, Directorate Of Pension And Pensioner's
         Welfare, Rajasthan Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.)
                                                                           ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)              :     Mr. Rajendra Kumar Saini
For Respondent(s)              :



           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

                               Judgment / Order

26/02/2024

1.    Learned        counsel       for    the     petitioner          submits     that    the

controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by

the Division Bench judgment in the case of Ramesh Chander

Gupta Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (D.B. Civil Writ

Petition     No.      2800/2021)             and      other      connected         matters,

decided on 17.10.2023.

2.    In these circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner

seeks liberty to approach respondent/s by way of filing

[2024:RJ-JP:10381] (2 of 3) [CW-20568/2023]

representation for redressal of their grievances in the light of

judgment rendered by this court in the case of Ramesh Chander

Gupta (supra).

3. In the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra), Division

Bench of this Court inter-alia while referring to orders passed in

Union of India & Ors. Vs. Manohar Lal & Ors.: D.B. Civil Writ

Petition No. 5445/2022, dediced on 07.08.2023 & the

Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan & Anr. Vs.

Ram Karan Bhakar & Ors.: D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.

4139/2022 as well as judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in

the case of Director (Admn. & HR) KPTCL & Ors. Vs. C.P.

Mundinamani & Ors.: 2023 SCC online SC 401 has passed the

following directions:-

"It is also brought to the notice of this Court that Special Leave Petition (C) No. 3420/2023 and Special Leave Petition (C) No. 1011/2023 have also been disposed off on 19.05.2023. A copy of the orders dated 11.04.2023 and 19.05.2023 passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court have also been placed on record. Therefore, the present petitions are also disposed off on the same terms with direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners and pass appropriate orders and other consequential benefits as per their entitlement. Whatever amount is found payable be also released within a period of one month. Accordingly, the present petitions are disposed of."

4. Ordered accordingly.

5. In the event of filing a representation by the petitioner, the

respondent/s shall consider the claim of the petitioner and pass an

appropriate order within two months from the date of receipt of

representation with certified copy of this order and that too in

accordance with law and the observations made in the case of

[2024:RJ-JP:10381] (3 of 3) [CW-20568/2023]

Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra), read with order dated

11.04.2023 in SLP(C) No. 3420/2023 and order dated

19.05.2023 in SLP(C) No. 1011/2023 passed by Hon'ble

Apex Court, as has been referred in the case of C.P.

Mundinamani & Ors. (supra).

6. The present writ petition stands disposed of.

7. The order has been passed based on the submissions made

by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the averments made

in the writ petition. The respondent/s would be at liberty to

examine the veracity of the submissions made in the writ petition

in the light of the observations made by the Division Bench of this

court in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta (supra), and only

in case the averments made therein are found to be correct, the

petitioners be extended the relief as prayed with consequential

benefits as ordered in the case of Ramesh Chander Gupta

(supra), read with order dated 11.04.2023 in SLP(C) No.

3420/2023 and order dated 19.05.2023 in SLP(C) No.

1011/2023 passed by Hon'ble Apex Court, as has been

referred in the case of C.P. Mundinamani & Ors. (supra).

8. Since the main petition has been disposed of, the stay

application and the pending application/s, if any, also stand

disposed of.

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

DIVYA SAINI /8

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter