Saturday, 09, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Saroj Devi W/O Narendra Singh Gurjar, ... vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:35028)
2024 Latest Caselaw 5368 Raj/2

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5368 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 20 August, 2024

Rajasthan High Court

Saroj Devi W/O Narendra Singh Gurjar, ... vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:35028) on 20 August, 2024

Author: Sameer Jain

Bench: Sameer Jain

[2024:RJ-JP:35028]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

               S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1703/2024
1.       Saroj Devi W/o Narendra Singh Gurjar, D/o Ramkaran
         Gurjar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Bhanwarwara Jahira,
         Karauli, Rajasthan.
2.       Narendra Singh Gurjar S/o Subuddhi Ram, Aged About 26
         Years, R/o Boorwal Ki Dhani, Pal, Karauli, Rajasthan.
                                                                  ----Petitioners
                                     Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of
         Home Affairs, And Justice, Secretariat Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.       Superintendent Of Police, Gangapur.
3.       Station House Officer, Police Station Nadoti, Gangapur,
         Rajasthan.
4.       Ramkesh Gurjar S/o Laduram Gurjar, Aged About 40
         Years, Resident Of Gram Bhanwarwara Post- Rajahera,
         Police Station- Nadauti District- Gangapur.
5.       Madho Singh Gurjar S/o Bhursingh, Aged About 48 Years,
         Resident Of Gram Bhanwarwara Post- Rajahera, Police
         Station- Nadauti District- Gangapur.
6.       Keshar Singh S/o Ramrakhya, Aged About 60 Years,
         Resident Of Gram Bhanwarwara Post- Rajahera, Police
         Station- Nadauti District- Gangapur.
7.       Ramdhan Gurjar S/o Ramchandra Gurjar, Aged About 52
         Years, Resident Of Gram Bhanwarwara Post- Rajahera,
         Police Station- Nadauti District- Gangapur.
8.       Nainu Ram Gurjar S/o Ganesh Gurjar, Aged About 65
         Years, Resident Of Gram Bhanwarwara Post- Rajahera,
         Police Station- Nadauti District- Gangapur.
9.       Harkesh Gurjar S/o Randheer Gurjar, Aged About 40
         Years, Resident Of Gram Bhanwarwara Post- Rajahera,
         Police Station- Nadauti District- Gangapur.
10.      Saudan Gurjar S/o Jai Narayan Gurjar, Aged About 58
         Years, Resident Of Gram Bhanwarwara Post- Rajahera,
         Police Station- Nadauti District- Gangapur.
11.      Mohar Singh Gurjar S/o Jansiram Gurjar, Aged About 48
         Years, Resident Of Gram Bhanwarwara Post- Rajahera,
         Police Station- Nadauti District- Gangapur.


                      (Downloaded on 30/08/2024 at 10:39:23 PM)
 [2024:RJ-JP:35028]                    (2 of 3)                      [CRLW-1703/2024]


12.      Hari Singh Gurjar S/o Kanaram Gurjar, Aged About 60
         Years, R/o Gram- Gopalpura, Post- Gudachandraji, Police
         Station- Nadauti, District Gangapur.
                                                                  ----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Tanay Jain
For Respondent(s)          :     Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP
                                 with Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP



                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

                                      Order

20/08/2024
1.    Heard and considered.


2. Vide the judgment dated 02.08.2024 in S.B. Criminal Writ

Petition No. 792/2024 titled as Suman Meena & Anr. Vs.

State of Rajasthan & Ors., this Court issued directions

specifying the mechanisms/remedies which may be invoked by the

person(s) who seek the implementation of measures to ensure

their safety, on account of extra-legal threats to their lives or

liberty from other social actors or groups. Therefore, the matter is

no longer res integra, and is squarely covered by the directions of

this Court in the judgment of Suman Meena (supra).

3. This Court observes that in the present case, the

petitioner(s) has/have failed to comply with the directions of this

Court in the judgment of Suman Meena (supra). Further, the

Registry has failed to ensure that the petition includes due

pleadings and a footnote disclosing the details which indicate that

the alternative efficacious remedies have already been availed of

[2024:RJ-JP:35028] (3 of 3) [CRLW-1703/2024]

in accordance with the directions of this Court in Suman Meena

(supra).

4. Accordingly, in terms of the judgment pronounced in Suman

Meena (supra), the instant petition is disposed of. Pending

applications, if any, stand disposed of.

5. A copy of this order be sent to the Registrar (Judicial) to

ensure compliance with the directions issued by this Court in

Suman Meena (supra) regarding the contents of the petitions

wherein directions are sought pertaining to protection.

(SAMEER JAIN),J

DEEPAK/21

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter