Tannu Kumari D/O. Shri Dhanesh Chand, ... vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:34287)
2024 Latest Caselaw 5323 Raj/2

Rajasthan High Court

Tannu Kumari D/O. Shri Dhanesh Chand, ... vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jp:34287) on 13 August, 2024

Author: Sameer Jain

Bench: Sameer Jain

[2024:RJ-JP:34287]

        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR

               S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1689/2024
1.       Tannu Kumari D/o. Shri Dhanesh Chand, W/o. Shri
         Rupesh Kumar, Aged About 19 Years, R/o. Village
         Ludhawai, P.S. Sewar, District Bharatpur, At Present
         Residing At Village Beri, Mudiya Lalita, P.S. Halena, Tehsil
         Weir, District Bharatpur.
2.       Rupesh Kumar S/o. Shri Bharat Singh, Aged About 23
         Years, R/o. Village Beri, Mudiya Lalita, P.S. Halena, Tehsil
         Weir, District Bharatpur.
                                                                   ----Petitioners
                                    Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Home
         Department,     Government            Of     Rajasthan,     Secretariat,
         Jaipur.
2.       Director General Of Police, Police Headquarters, Jaipur.
3.       Superintendent Of Police, Bharatpur.
4.       SHO, Police Station Halena, District Bharatpur.
5.       Dhanesh S/o. Late Shri Dal Chand, R/o. Village Ludhawai,
         P.S. Sewar, District Bharatpur,
                                                                 ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Satya Pal Poshwal with Mr. Jay Prakash For Respondent(s) : Mr. Atul Sharma, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN

Order

13/08/2024

1. Heard and considered.

2. Vide the judgment dated 02.08.2024 in S.B. Criminal Writ

Petition No. 792/2024 titled as Suman Meena & Anr. Vs.

State of Rajasthan & Ors., this Court issued directions

specifying the mechanisms/remedies which may be invoked by the

person(s) who seek the implementation of measures to ensure

[2024:RJ-JP:34287] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1689/2024]

their safety, on account of extra-legal threats to their lives or

liberty from other social actors or groups. Therefore, the matter is

no longer res integra, and is squarely covered by the directions of

this Court in the judgment of Suman Meena (supra).

3. This Court observes that in the present case, the

petitioner(s) has/have failed to comply with the directions of this

Court in the judgment of Suman Meena (supra). Further, the

Registry has failed to ensure that the petition includes due

pleadings and a footnote disclosing the details which indicate that

the alternative efficacious remedies have already been availed of

in accordance with the directions of this Court in Suman Meena

(supra).

4. Accordingly, in terms of the judgment pronounced in Suman

Meena (supra), the instant petition is disposed of. Pending

applications, if any, stand disposed of.

5. A copy of this order be sent to the Registrar (Judicial) to

ensure compliance with the directions issued by this Court in

Suman Meena (supra) regarding the contents of the petitions

wherein directions are sought pertaining to protection.

(SAMEER JAIN),J

DEEPAK/13

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)