Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shaitan Ram vs State Of Rajasthan ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 7075 Raj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7075 Raj
Judgement Date : 12 September, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Shaitan Ram vs State Of Rajasthan ... on 12 September, 2023
Bench: Vijay Bishnoi, Rajendra Prakash Soni

[2023:RJ-JD:29037-DB]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR D.B. Criminal Misc 2nd Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 858/2023 IN D.B. Crl. Appeal No.118/2019

Shaitan Ram S/o Mohan Lal, Aged About 25 Years, By Caste Bhatt, Resident of Vishwakarma Colony, Nearby Fullad Crossing, Sojat Road Police Station, Sojat Road, District Pali.

(Lodged In District Jail, Pali)

----Appellant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Appellant(s) : Mr. RS Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.R. Bishnoi, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI

Order

12/09/2023

1. The matter comes upon for consideration of the second

application for suspension of sentence.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties on the second

application for suspension of sentence.

3. The instant application for suspension of sentence has been

preferred by the appellant-applicant, who has been convicted and

sentenced by the learned trial court vide impugned judgment

dated 20.12.2018 in Sessions Case No.11/2017. The appellant-

applicant has been sentenced as under :-






 [2023:RJ-JD:29037-DB]                   (2 of 4)                       [SOSA-858/2023]


Offence U/s     Sentence               Fine                 Sentence in default of
                                                            payment of fine
302 IPC         Life                   Rs.50,000/- Three years' additional
                imprisonment                       R.I.
394 IPC         Ten years' R.I. Rs.10,000/- Three years' additional
                                            R.I.
397 IPC         Seven years'               ____                     ______
                R.I.


4. Learned counsel for the appellant-applicant has argued that

the appellant-applicant went out of State for earning his livelihood

and, therefore, failed to mark his presence before the trial court in

the month of January 2018-2019 and in the month of January

2020-2021 as per the conditions of order of suspension of

sentence. It is further submitted that in the proceedings initiated

against the sureties under Section 446 Cr.P.C., surety Dala Ram S/

o Ganesh Ram has already deposited Rs.25,000/- with the trial

court on 09.05.2022. It is further submitted that so far as

another surety Bhanwar Lal is concerned, as he expired and,

therefore, the surety amount could not be deposited.

5. Learned counsel for the appellant-applicant submitted that

henceforth, the appellant-applicant will abide by all the conditions

of suspension of sentence and will not make any default. It is

submitted that as hearing of the appeal is likely to take time, the

sentence awarded to the appellant-applicant may be suspended.

6. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed this application for

suspension of sentence.

7. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances

of the case and without making any observation on the merits of

the case, we are inclined to suspend the sentence awarded to the

[2023:RJ-JD:29037-DB] (3 of 4) [SOSA-858/2023]

appellant-applicant.

8. Accordingly, this second application for suspension of

sentence filed under Sec.389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered

that the sentence passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sojat,

District Pali vide judgment dated 20.12.2018 in Sessions Case

No.11/2017 against appellant-applicant Shaitan Ram S/o

Mohan Lal shall remain suspended till final disposal of the appeal,

provided he executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/-

along with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of

the learned trial judge for his appearance in this Court on

16.10.2023 and whenever ordered to do so, till the disposal of the

appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the appellant change the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

9. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-appellant in a separate file. Such file be registered as

Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

appellant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

[2023:RJ-JD:29037-DB] (4 of 4) [SOSA-858/2023]

pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said

accused-appellant do not appear before the trial court, the learned

trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

cancellation of bail.

(RAJENDRA PRAKASH SONI),J (VIJAY BISHNOI),J

40-Payal/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter