Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mukesh Kumar Dad vs The State Of Rajasthan ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 7883 Raj

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7883 Raj
Judgement Date : 4 October, 2023

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Mukesh Kumar Dad vs The State Of Rajasthan ... on 4 October, 2023
Bench: Vinit Kumar Mathur

[2023:RJ-JD:32647]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13967/2023

1. Mukesh Kumar Dad S/o Shri Ramswaroop Dad, Aged About 49 Years, R/o 142, Main Shastri Nagar, Bhilwara.

2. Teeku Ram S/o Shri Mala Ram, Aged About 53 Years, R/o V.p. Khakhasar, Tehsil Gida, Disit. Barmer.

3. Vikas Sharma S/o Shri Om Prakash Sharma, Aged About 45 Years, R/o E-137, Vishwakarma Marg Nirman Nagar, Jaipur.

4. Sanjay Sharma S/o Shri Hetram Sharma, Aged About 55 Years, R/o 1 Krishna Nagar, Near Vaishali Police Station, Vaishali Nagar Jaipur.

5. Chhitar Singh S/o Shri Shiv Narayan Singh, Aged About 66 Years, R/o 208, Ak Gopalan Nagar, Khatipura Road, Jaipur.

6. Madan Mohan Sharma S/o Late Shri Lalta Prasad, Aged About 58 Years, R/o 2 Krishna Nagar, Vaishali Nagar, Near Vaishali Police Station, Jaipur.

7. Balveer Singh S/o Shri Sujjan Singh, Aged About 57 Years, R/o 124 Gayatri Nagar-B Maharani Farm, Durgapura, Jaipur.

8. Gopal Krishna Sharma S/o Shri Tekchand Sharma, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Sharma Sadan, Near Muni Ashrama, Jhunjhunu.

9. Ashok Kumar Sharma S/o Late Shayam Sunder Sharma, Aged About 58 Years, R/o A-94, Krni Nagar, Pavanpuri, Bikaner.

----Petitioners Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Transport, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302005.

2. The Commissioner, Department Of Rajasthan Transport, 409, Sahakar Marg, Jyoti Nagar, Lalkothi, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302005.

----Respondents

[2023:RJ-JD:32647] (2 of 3) [CW-13967/2023]

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankur Mathur For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudhir Tak, AAG

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Order

04/10/2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The present writ petition has been filed with the following

prayers:-

"(a) The record of the case may kindly called.

(b) The respondents may be directed to refix the pay scale of the post of Motor Vehicle Sub Inspectors at par to that with the posts of Mechanics in Rajasthan Police Forensic Science Subordinate Service, Instructor in ITI and Mechanical Foreman in Mines and Geology Department w.e.f. the date of entry in service;

(c) The respondents may be directed to grant the benefit of revised pay scale to the petitioners as per the Notification dated 06.04.2013 w.e.f. 01.09.2008 along with interest to the tune of 12 percent per annum;

(d) That the respondents may further be directed to grant all consequential benefits in accordance with law;"

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by a

judgment of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition

No.1723/2001 "Vinay Bansal & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

& Anr." decided on 28.05.2015. Learned counsel further submits

that the matter has attained finality as the appeal against the

order dated 28.05.2015 has been affirmed by the Division Bench

vide judgment dated 23.11.2017 and the S.L.P against the

Division Bench judgment dated 23.11.2017 has also been

[2023:RJ-JD:32647] (3 of 3) [CW-13967/2023]

dismissed vide order dated 03.05.2019. He submits that the

review petition and thereafter curative petition against the order

of the Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 03.05.2019 too was rejected.

In these circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioners

submits that the petitioners are entitled to the same relief which

was extended by the Department in the case of Vinay Bansal

(supra).

Learned counsel for the respondents is not in a position to

dispute the submissions made by the learned counsel for the

petitioners.

In view of the discussions made above, the writ petition

merits acceptance and the same is allowed in terms of the order

passed by this Court in the case of Vinay Bansal (supra) on

28.05.2015. The respondents are directed to extend the benefits

accruing to the petitioners within a period of two months from the

date of receipt of the certified copy of this order.

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J 124-Vivek/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter