Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Gajanand Ram Jat (Belt No. ... vs State Of Rajasthan ... on 1 May, 2023
Bench: Vinit Kumar Mathur
[2023/RJJD/012801]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5825/2023
1. Gajanand Ram Jat (Belt No. 799/1707) S/o Shri Ishwar
Ram Jat, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Sirsi Post
Lunwa, Teh. Nawa, District Nagaur.
2. Bhinwaram Seemar (Belt No. 1106) S/o Shri Ugamaram
Seemar, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Bhanipura, Post
Dudawa, Ps Jinmata Ji, District Sikar, Rajasthan.
3. Kuldeep Singh (Belt No. 1047) S/o Shri Dharma Singh,
Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Ondelijat, Post Ondel
Gaddi, Teh. Roopwas, District Bharatpur (Raj.)
4. Raghuveer Yadav (Belt No. 611) S/o Shri Keshar Lal
Yadav, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village And Post
Hindhupura, Teh. Bonli, District Sawaimadhopur. (Raj.)
5. Ravindra Singh (Belt No. 1124) S/o Shri Om Prakash
Singh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Nahar Ka Chota Sotya
Para, District Bundi (Raj.)
6. Hemraj Gocher (Belt No. 811) S/o Shri Rambilas Gocher,
Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Hapolai, Post Modsa,
Teh. Nainwan, District Bundi (Raj.)
7. Sugriv (Belt No. 1114) S/o Shri Ramhet, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Village And Post Jatmasi, Teh. Rupbas, District
Bharatpur (Raj.)
8. Sunil Kumar Prajapat (Belt No. 664) S/o Shri Mohan Lal,
Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Haripura, Post Nayagav,
Teh. And District Bundi (Raj.)
9. Keshav Singh (Belt No. 670) S/o Shri Brijendra Singh,
Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village And Post Baraulichhar,
Teh. Nandbai District Bharatpur (Raj.)
10. Shelendra Singh Hada (Belt No. 511) S/o Shri Bahadur
Singh Hada, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village And Post
Richhwa, Teh. Jhalrapatan, District Jhalawar (Raj.)
11. Umakant Sharma (Belt No. 1139) S/o Shri Ramprakash
Sharma, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Sonothi, Post
Kurka, Teh. Ucchain, District Bharatpur (Raj.)
12. Shiv Singh (Belt No. 572) S/o Shri Sher Sigh, Aged About
36 Years, R/o Village And Post Sadpura, Teh. Bayana,
District Bharatpur (Raj.)
[2023/RJJD/012801] (2 of 4) [CW-5825/2023]
13. Vijendra Singh Chandrawat (Belt No. 1111) S/o Shri
Shyam Singh Chandrawat, Aged About 33 Years, R/o
Rajat Grah Colony, Gate No.4, House No. 214, Nainwan
Road District Bundi (Raj.)
14. Hemraj (Belt No. 1105-1206) S/o Shri Aidanram, Aged
About 32 Years, R/o Village Gaguda, Post Dhawada, Teh.
Merta City, District Nagaur (Raj.)
15. Bansidhar Jakhar (Belt No. 929) S/o Shri Sukharam
Jakhar, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Likma Ka Bas,
Teh. Dataramgarh, District Sikar (Raj.)
16. Yogesh Kumar (Belt No. 704) S/o Shri Mohan Lal, Aged
About 33 Years, R/o Village Hado Ka Pipalda, Post Lilera
Vyasan, Teh. Talera, District Bundi (Raj.)
17. Bhopendra Singh (Belt No. 1122) S/o Shri Laxman Singh,
Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village And Post Bahaj, Teh.
Deeg, District Bharatpur (Raj.)
18. Sawai Singh (Belt No. 1109) S/o Shri Hanumanram, Aged
About 30 Years, R/o Vishnu Colony, Ps Sadar, District
Barmar (Raj.)
19. Naresh Kumar (Belt No. 654) S/o Shri Kalyan Singh, Aged
About 31 Years, R/o Village And Post Jatmasi, Teh.
Rupbas, District Bharatpur (Raj.)
20. Anil Kumar Gocher (Belt No. 801) S/o Shri Hariprasad
Gocher, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Kalmiya, Post
Jakoda, Teh. Nainawan, District Bundi (Raj.)
21. Narjeet Singh Ranawat (Driver) (Belt No. 1148) S/o Shri
Shankar Singh Ranawat, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village
And Post Bhileth, Teh. Jhajpur, District Bhilwara.
22. Hemant Singh (Belt No. 1110) S/o Shri Ram Bharosi,
Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village And Post Khatauti, Teh.
Nandbai, District Bharatpur.
23. Gajendra Kumar Yadav (Belt No. 1123) S/o Shri Ram Lal
Yadav, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village And Post
Raghunathpura, Teh. Hindoli, District Bundi (Raj.)
24. Ramesh Singh (Belt No. 863) S/o Shri Ghasi Lal, Aged
About 31 Years, R/o Village Pratappura, Post Chousala,
Teh. Malpura Distt. Tonk (Raj.)
25. Babu Lal Gurjar (Belt No. 810) S/o Shri Ram Karan
Gurjar, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Sasti, Post
[2023/RJJD/012801] (3 of 4) [CW-5825/2023]
Peepliya, Teh. Nainwan, District Bundi (Raj.)
26. Mohan Lal (Belt No. 567-2787) S/o Shri Heeralal
Choudhary, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Mool Ji Ki
Dhani, Post Janiyana, Teh. Pachapadra, District Barmer
(Raj.)
27. Kartar Singh (Belt No. 532) S/o Shri Sujan Singh, Aged
About 31 Years, R/o Village And Post Baroda, Teh.
Bayana, District Bharatpur (Raj.)
28. Dharmendra Singh (Belt No. 1135-803) S/o Shri Laxman
Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Bhojawas, Post
Maundana, Teh. Tijara, District Alwar (Raj.)
29. Devkaran Jangid (Belt No. 662) S/o Shri Tejaram Jangid,
Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village Butati Vaya Ren, Teh.
Degana, District Nagour (Raj.)
30. Mahaveer Mali (Belt No. 854) S/o Shri Kishan Gopal, Aged
About 34 Years, R/o Village Bhanwarkol, Post Talwas, Teh.
Naiwan, District Bundi (Raj.)
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Home Secretary,
Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur
3. Inspector General Of Police (Kota Range), Kota,
(Rajasthan).
4. Superintendent Of Police, Bundi (Raj.)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Jhanjharia
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
01/05/2023
1. It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioners that the issue
raised in the present writ petition is covered by the judgment in
[2023/RJJD/012801] (4 of 4) [CW-5825/2023]
Dara Singh v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition
No.11973/2012, decided on 17.12.2012.
2. In the case of Dara Singh (supra), a coordinate Bench of this
Court, inter alia, directed as under:
"Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
realizing the mistake, appointment has been given,
thus, grievance of petitioner to the extent is
redressed, but appointment should have been made
effective from the date candidates lesser in merit
were given appointment with notional benefits.
In view of the prayer made and taking note of the
order dated 13.12.2012 whereby petitioner is given
appointment realizing mistake by the respondents, I
consider it proper to direct that aforesaid appointment
should be treated from the date when lesser
meritorious candidates were given. The petitioner
would, accordingly, be entitled to the notional benefits
and seniority from the date persons with less merit
were given appointment. The actual benefits would be
allowed from the date of joining pursuant to the order
dated 13.12.2012.
With the aforesaid, writ petition stands disposed of."
3. In view of the submissions made, the writ petition filed by
the petitioners is disposed of with similar directions to the
respondents No.3 & 4 as given in the case of Dara Singh (supra).
4. The order has been passed based on the submissions made
in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the
veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case,
the averments made therein are found to be correct, the
petitioners would be entitled to the relief.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
163-/Vivek/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
