Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Lokesh Son Of Shri Girraj vs State Of Rajasthan
2023 Latest Caselaw 2201 Raj/2

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2201 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2023

Rajasthan High Court
Lokesh Son Of Shri Girraj vs State Of Rajasthan on 17 February, 2023
Bench: Farjand Ali
      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                  BENCH AT JAIPUR

   S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application No.
                                    278/2023

                                          In

                S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 2555/2022

Lokesh Son Of Shri Girraj, Resident Of Bhadangpura, Police
Station Sapotra, District Karauli (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined
In Jail At Karauli )
                                                                     ----Appellant
                                      Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                   ----Respondent
For Appellant(s)             :    Mr. Rajneesh Gupta
For Respondent(s)            :    Mr. B.L. Nasuna, PP
                                  Ms. Simran Bhati



              HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

                                       Order

17/02/2023

Heard learned counsel for the accused appellant and learned

Public Prosecutor on the application for suspension of sentence

and perused the judgment impugned dated 21.11.2022 passed by

learned Special Judge, POCSO Act cum Commission for Protection

of Child Right Act, 2005, Karauli whereby the accused appellant

has been convicted for the offence punishable under sections 366,

376(2)(n) and 363 IPC and Section 5(l)/6 of POCSO Act and has

been sentenced to maximum twenty years rigorous imprisonment

along with fine of Rs. 1,00,000/- for the offence punishable under

Section 5(l)/6 of POCSO Act.

(2 of 3) [SOSA-278/2023]

Learned counsel for the accused-appellant submits that from

the circumstances, a safe inference of consent can easily be

drawn. It is submitted that as many as 124 calls were exchanged

in between them; he raised numerous arguments with a view to

dispute the age of the victim.

Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant

vehemently opposes the prayer made by learned counsel for the

accused-appellant on the ground the victim is minor and was

subjected to rape.

The accused-appellant is behind the bars and the hearing of

appeal is likely to take further more time, therefore, considering

the overall submissions and looking to the totality of facts and

circumstances of the case while refraining from passing any

comments on the niceties of the matter and the defects of the

prosecution as the same may put an adverse effect on hearing of

the appeal, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for

suspending the sentence awarded to the accused appellant.

Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed

under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the

sentences passed by the learned Special Judge, POCSO Act cum

Commission for Protection of Child Right Act, 2005, Karauli, vide

judgment dated 21.11.2022 in Sessions Case No. 02/2022 against

the appellant-applicant Lokesh Son Of Shri Girraj shall remain

suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and he shall be

released on bail provided he executes a personal bond in the sum

of Rs.50,000/-with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the

satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance in this

(3 of 3) [SOSA-278/2023]

court on 22.03.2023 and whenever ordered to do so till the

disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial

Court in the month of January of every year till the

appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of

residence, he/she/they will give in writing

his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as

well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their

address(s),they will give in writing their changed

address to the trial Court.

The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered

as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the

accused-applicants were tried and convicted. A copy of this order

shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc.

file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating

to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the

said accused applicants does not appear before the trial court, the

learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

cancellation of bail.

(FARJAND ALI),J

PREETI VALECHA /60

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter