Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vinod Kumar Meena S/O Kalu Ram ... vs The State Of Rajasthan
2023 Latest Caselaw 2020 Raj/2

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2020 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 10 February, 2023

Rajasthan High Court
Vinod Kumar Meena S/O Kalu Ram ... vs The State Of Rajasthan on 10 February, 2023
Bench: Sudesh Bansal
      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                  BENCH AT JAIPUR

              S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2643/2023

Dinesh Paliwal S/o Shri Shayam Prakash Paliwal
                                                                  ----Petitioner
                                   Versus
The Chairman Rajasthan Staff Selection Board
                                                                ----Respondent

Connected with S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2653/2023 S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2692/2023 S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2697/2023 S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2712/2023 S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.2715/2023 S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2656/2023

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hitesh Bagri with Mr. Nadeem Mazahir Ms. Komal Kumari Giri Mr. Rajesh Gadwal with Mr. Waseem Akaram Mr. Manoj Kumar Mr. Dilip Singh Kurka Mr.Ram Pratap Saini Mr. B.B.L. Sharma For Respondent(s) :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL

Order

10/02/2023

1. Counsel for petitioners submit that petitioners have qualified

minimum qualifying marks in the written exam conducted for the

post of Fireman pursuant to advertisement dated 10.08.2021

(Ann.1). It has been stated that 70 marks were fixed for written

examination and 150 marks were fixed for physical efficiency &

practical test. In written examination, a candidate of general

category was required to obtain 33% marks and a candidate of

reserve category was required to obtain 28% marks and then

(2 of 2) [CW-2643/2023]

he/she is required to be called for physical efficiency and practical

examination.

2. It has been submitted that respondents neither called

petitioners for physical measurement in respect of height, weight

and expansion of chest, nor called for the physical efficiency and

practical test.

3. It has been further submitted that in similar set of facts,

Hon'ble Division Bench in DB Civil Writ Petition No.18627/2022

titled Gopal Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan, placing reliance on

judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Pradeep Singh

Dehal Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh (Civil Appeal

Nos.7211-7212/2019) as also placing reliance on an another

judgment passed by the Coordinate Bench in case of Rajasthan

Public Service Commission Vs. Naresh Sharam (DB Civil

Special Appeal No.886/2005), has permitted petitioners to

appear for physical & practical examination provisionally.

3. Heard.

4. Issue notice.

5. In the meanwhile, respondents are directed to allow the

petitioners, for the purpose of physical measurement in respect of

height, weight & chest expansion and if they qualify the criteria of

physical measurement, then call them for physical efficiency &

practical test, provisionally, if have not been already called.

6. List along with SB Civil Writ Petition No.328/2023.

7. Copy of this order be placed in connected file.

(SUDESH BANSAL),J

TN/12,15,33,34,42,44,17

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter